Radeon HD 8510G vs RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Aggregated performance score
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) outperforms HD 8510G by 388% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary Details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 617 | 1082 |
Place by popularity | 34 | not in top-100 |
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation | no data | 0.01 |
Architecture | Vega (2017−2021) | TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) |
GPU code name | Vega Raven Ridge | Trinity |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 26 October 2017 (6 years ago) | 23 May 2013 (10 years ago) |
Current price | no data | $659 |
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed Specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 512 | 384 |
Core clock speed | no data | 450 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 554 MHz |
Number of transistors | no data | 1,303 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Texture fill rate | no data | 17.28 |
Form Factor & Compatibility
Information on Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and Radeon HD 8510G compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Interface | no data | IGP |
VRAM Capacity and Type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | no data | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | no data | System Shared |
Memory bus width | no data | System Shared |
Memory clock speed | no data | System Shared |
Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and Outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
API Compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12_1 | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | no data | 5.0 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.4 |
OpenCL | no data | 1.2 |
Vulkan | no data | N/A |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 18
+500%
| 3−4
−500%
|
4K | 10
+400%
| 2−3
−400%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 9
+200%
|
3−4
−200%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 15
+400%
|
3−4
−400%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 10
+400%
|
2−3
−400%
|
Battlefield 5 | 24
+500%
|
4−5
−500%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 16
+77.8%
|
9−10
−77.8%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 9
+200%
|
3−4
−200%
|
Far Cry 5 | 12
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 13
+550%
|
2−3
−550%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 26
+420%
|
5−6
−420%
|
Hitman 3 | 10−11 | 0−1 |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 12 | 0−1 |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 12
+300%
|
3−4
−300%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 12
+100%
|
6−7
−100%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 12
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 11
+450%
|
2−3
−450%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 3−4 | 0−1 |
Battlefield 5 | 22
+450%
|
4−5
−450%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 6
−50%
|
9−10
+50%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 6
+100%
|
3−4
−100%
|
Far Cry 5 | 10
+400%
|
2−3
−400%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 14
+600%
|
2−3
−600%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 30
+400%
|
6−7
−400%
|
Hitman 3 | 10−11 | 0−1 |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9 | 0−1 |
Metro Exodus | 7
+600%
|
1−2
−600%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10
+200%
|
3−4
−200%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 10
+66.7%
|
6−7
−66.7%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 13
+333%
|
3−4
−333%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 8
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 3−4 | 0−1 |
Battlefield 5 | 23
+475%
|
4−5
−475%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
Far Cry 5 | 9
+800%
|
1−2
−800%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 14
+600%
|
2−3
−600%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 23
+475%
|
4−5
−475%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8
+167%
|
3−4
−167%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 7−8
+133%
|
3−4
−133%
|
Hitman 3 | 8−9
+167%
|
3−4
−167%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−12
+37.5%
|
8−9
−37.5%
|
Metro Exodus | 3−4 | 0−1 |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 8−9
+60%
|
5−6
−60%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 2−3 | 0−1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Far Cry 5 | 7−8
+250%
|
2−3
−250%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 3−4 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
Hitman 3 | 4−5
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 3 | 0−1 |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 4 | 0−1 |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 2−3 | 0−1 |
Battlefield 5 | 6
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 7−8
+40%
|
5−6
−40%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 9
+800%
|
1−2
−800%
|
This is how RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and HD 8510G compete in popular games:
- RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is 500% faster than HD 8510G in 1080p
- RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is 400% faster than HD 8510G in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is 600% faster than the HD 8510G.
- in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the HD 8510G is 50% faster than the RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000).
All in all, in popular games:
- RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is ahead in 24 tests (96%)
- HD 8510G is ahead in 1 test (4%)
Pros & Cons Summary
Performance score | 4.49 | 0.92 |
Recency | 26 October 2017 | 23 May 2013 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
The Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8510G in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with Similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.