Quadro 5010M vs Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) with Quadro 5010M, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
2017
15 Watt
4.15
+2.7%

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) outperforms 5010M by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking702712
Place by popularity46not in top-100
Power efficiency21.093.08
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeGF110
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date26 October 2017 (7 years ago)22 February 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512384
Core clock speed300 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHzno data
Number of transistors9,800 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate57.6021.60
Floating-point processing power1.843 TFLOPS0.6912 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs3248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPMXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared650 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data83.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.1
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA-2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 4.15
+2.7%
Quadro 5010M 4.04

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 1737
+2.7%
Quadro 5010M 1691

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 3557
+32.1%
Quadro 5010M 2693

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 10294
Quadro 5010M 12991
+26.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p35−40
−8.6%
38
+8.6%
Full HD18
−228%
59
+228%
4K10
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Sons of the Forest 12
+200%
4−5
−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 24
+50%
16−18
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12−14
+0%
Fortnite 30
+25%
24−27
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 26
+36.8%
18−20
−36.8%
Forza Horizon 5 17
+70%
10−11
−70%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 17
+0%
16−18
+0%
Sons of the Forest 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 22
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 42
−73.8%
70−75
+73.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Dota 2 38
+5.6%
35−40
−5.6%
Far Cry 5 10
−20%
12−14
+20%
Fortnite 19
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Forza Horizon 4 30
+57.9%
18−20
−57.9%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 7
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14
−21.4%
16−18
+21.4%
Sons of the Forest 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 23
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
−60%
8−9
+60%
Dota 2 35
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Far Cry 5 9
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 23
+21.1%
18−20
−21.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14
−21.4%
16−18
+21.4%
Sons of the Forest 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
−50%
12−14
+50%
Valorant 15
−267%
55−60
+267%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10
−140%
24−27
+140%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+4.7%
40−45
−4.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Sons of the Forest 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+5%
20−22
−5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 15
+15.4%
12−14
−15.4%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9
+80%
5−6
−80%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Sons of the Forest 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and Quadro 5010M compete in popular games:

  • Quadro 5010M is 9% faster in 900p
  • Quadro 5010M is 228% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is 11% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Sons of the Forest, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is 200% faster.
  • in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro 5010M is 267% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is ahead in 24 tests (40%)
  • Quadro 5010M is ahead in 13 tests (22%)
  • there's a draw in 23 tests (38%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.15 4.04
Recency 26 October 2017 22 February 2011
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 100 Watt

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) has a 2.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and Quadro 5010M.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is a notebook graphics card while Quadro 5010M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Quadro 5010M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1703 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 9 votes

Rate Quadro 5010M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) or Quadro 5010M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.