CDNA3 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	621	not rated
Place by popularity	42	not in top-100
Architecture	Vega (2017−2021)	CDNA 3.0
GPU code name	Vega Raven Ridge	CDNA3
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	26 October 2017 (6 years ago)	no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	2x 7040
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	no data	146,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount	no data	2x 64 GB MB
Memory bus width	no data	2x 4096 Bit
Memory bandwidth	no data	2x 1638 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_1	N/A
Shader Model	no data	N/A
OpenGL	no data	N/A
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	no data	N/A

Pros & cons summary

---

Chip lithography

14 nm

5 nm

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---