Liverpool 16nm vs Radeon RX Vega 7
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 529 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 12 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Vega (2017−2020) | GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) |
| GPU code name | Vega Raven Ridge | Liverpool 16nm |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 7 January 2020 (4 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 448 | 1152 |
| Boost clock speed | 1800 MHz | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Shared memory | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | 11.1* |
| Shader Model | no data | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.1 |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 16 nm |
RX Vega 7 has a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 7 and Liverpool 16nm. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 7 is a notebook card while Liverpool 16nm is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
