HD Graphics 12EU vs Radeon Vega 7

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking530not rated
Place by popularity39not in top-100
Power efficiency11.56no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Generation 5.75 (2010)
GPU code nameCezanneIronlake
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 April 2021 (3 years ago)10 January 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores44896
Core clock speed300 MHz533 MHz
Boost clock speed1900 MHzno data
Number of transistors9,800 million177 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate53.206.396
Floating-point processing power1.702 TFLOPS0.1023 TFLOPS
ROPs82
TMUs2812

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPQPI
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.1
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 April 2021 10 January 2010
Chip lithography 7 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 35 Watt

Vega 7 has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

HD Graphics 12EU, on the other hand, has 28.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Vega 7 and HD Graphics 12EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Vega 7 is a notebook card while HD Graphics 12EU is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Vega 7
Radeon Vega 7
Intel HD Graphics 12EU
HD Graphics 12EU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1953 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 17 votes

Rate HD Graphics 12EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.