GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES vs Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameVega 10GF114
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date8 August 2017 (7 years ago)24 September 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096336
Core clock speed1406 MHz779 MHz
Boost clock speed1677 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate429.343.62
Floating-point processing powerno data1.046 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs25656

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm210 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1280 MB
Memory bus width2048 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1890 MHz1002 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s128.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 August 2017 24 September 2011
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1280 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 160 Watt

RX Vega 64 Liquid has an age advantage of 5 years, a 540% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 460 v2 ES, on the other hand, has 40.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid and GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES
GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 26 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 15 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.