GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	not rated	177
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	18.57
Architecture	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Vega 10	N18E-G1 TU106
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	7 August 2017 (6 years ago)	6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$699	no data
Current price	$246 (0.4x MSRP)	$1250

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4096	1920
Core clock speed	1408 MHz	960 MHz
Boost clock speed	1668 MHz	1200 MHz
Number of transistors	12,500 million	10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	345 Watt	80-90 Watt
Texture fill rate	427.0	144.0
Floating-point performance	14,336 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling and GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	282 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	no data

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	2048 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1890 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	483.8 GB/s	336.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data
G-SYNC support	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.125	1.2.131
CUDA	no data	7.5

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	7 August 2017	6 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	345 Watt	80 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---