Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) with Radeon Pro Vega 64X, including specs and performance data.
Pro Vega 64X outperforms RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) by a whopping 474% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 586 | 149 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 27.78 | 9.57 |
Architecture | Vega (2017−2020) | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) |
GPU code name | Vega Renoir | Vega 10 |
Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 7 January 2020 (4 years ago) | 19 March 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 4096 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1468 MHz |
Number of transistors | no data | 12,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 250 Watt |
Texture fill rate | no data | 375.8 |
Floating-point processing power | no data | 12.03 TFLOPS |
ROPs | no data | 64 |
TMUs | no data | 256 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | no data | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | no data | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | no data | 16 GB |
Memory bus width | no data | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | no data | 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | no data | 512.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | no data | 6.4 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
OpenCL | no data | 2.0 |
Vulkan | - | 1.1.125 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 20
−450%
| 110−120
+450%
|
1440p | 28
−471%
| 160−170
+471%
|
4K | 20
−450%
| 110−120
+450%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 11
−445%
|
60−65
+445%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 16
−463%
|
90−95
+463%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 8−9
−463%
|
45−50
+463%
|
Battlefield 5 | 16−18
−459%
|
95−100
+459%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 14
−471%
|
80−85
+471%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 9
−456%
|
50−55
+456%
|
Far Cry 5 | 14−16
−471%
|
80−85
+471%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 18−20
−456%
|
100−105
+456%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
−461%
|
230−240
+461%
|
Hitman 3 | 11
−445%
|
60−65
+445%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 97
−467%
|
550−600
+467%
|
Metro Exodus | 23
−465%
|
130−140
+465%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 22
−445%
|
120−130
+445%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 21−24
−445%
|
120−130
+445%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 62
−465%
|
350−400
+465%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 16−18
−463%
|
90−95
+463%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 8−9
−463%
|
45−50
+463%
|
Battlefield 5 | 16−18
−459%
|
95−100
+459%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 12
−442%
|
65−70
+442%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 6
−400%
|
30−33
+400%
|
Far Cry 5 | 14−16
−471%
|
80−85
+471%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 18−20
−456%
|
100−105
+456%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
−461%
|
230−240
+461%
|
Hitman 3 | 12−14
−438%
|
70−75
+438%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 73
−448%
|
400−450
+448%
|
Metro Exodus | 17
−459%
|
95−100
+459%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 14
−471%
|
80−85
+471%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 21
−471%
|
120−130
+471%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 20−22
−450%
|
110−120
+450%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 50
−460%
|
280−290
+460%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 16−18
−463%
|
90−95
+463%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 8−9
−463%
|
45−50
+463%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 12−14
−438%
|
70−75
+438%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
−450%
|
55−60
+450%
|
Far Cry 5 | 14−16
−471%
|
80−85
+471%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
−461%
|
230−240
+461%
|
Hitman 3 | 12−14
−438%
|
70−75
+438%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 17
−459%
|
95−100
+459%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 18
−456%
|
100−105
+456%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 11
−445%
|
60−65
+445%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 50−55
−469%
|
290−300
+469%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 14
−471%
|
80−85
+471%
|
1440p
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 12−14
−442%
|
65−70
+442%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 10−11
−450%
|
55−60
+450%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 6−7
−400%
|
30−33
+400%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 6−7
−400%
|
30−33
+400%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−433%
|
16−18
+433%
|
Far Cry 5 | 7−8
−471%
|
40−45
+471%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
−426%
|
100−105
+426%
|
Hitman 3 | 10−11
−450%
|
55−60
+450%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 14−16
−471%
|
80−85
+471%
|
Metro Exodus | 6−7
−400%
|
30−33
+400%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 2−3
−400%
|
10−11
+400%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−440%
|
27−30
+440%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 40−45
−450%
|
220−230
+450%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−12
−445%
|
60−65
+445%
|
4K
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 5−6
−440%
|
27−30
+440%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 4−5
−425%
|
21−24
+425%
|
Hitman 3 | 2−3
−400%
|
10−11
+400%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 11
−445%
|
60−65
+445%
|
Metro Exodus | 3−4
−433%
|
16−18
+433%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−433%
|
16−18
+433%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 4−5
−425%
|
21−24
+425%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 3−4
−433%
|
16−18
+433%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−433%
|
16−18
+433%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−433%
|
16−18
+433%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
−400%
|
30−33
+400%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 2−3
−400%
|
10−11
+400%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 7−8
−471%
|
40−45
+471%
|
This is how RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and Pro Vega 64X compete in popular games:
- Pro Vega 64X is 450% faster in 1080p
- Pro Vega 64X is 471% faster in 1440p
- Pro Vega 64X is 450% faster in 4K
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 6.04 | 34.68 |
Recency | 7 January 2020 | 19 March 2019 |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 250 Watt |
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) has an age advantage of 9 months, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 1566.7% lower power consumption.
Pro Vega 64X, on the other hand, has a 474.2% higher aggregate performance score.
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro Vega 64X is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.