GeForce2 MX vs Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5981537
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency27.69no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameVega RenoirNV11 A2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2020 (5 years ago)28 June 2000 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed400 MHz175 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data20 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data0.7
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSDR
Maximum RAM amountno data32 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data166 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.656 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x VGA

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_17.0
OpenGLno data1.2
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD20no data
1440p23no data
4K18no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 19 no data
Counter-Strike 2 52 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 13 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 15 no data
Battlefield 5 22 no data
Counter-Strike 2 34 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10 no data
Far Cry 5 15 no data
Fortnite 33 no data
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 5 12 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24 no data
Valorant 97 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 9 no data
Battlefield 5 21 no data
Counter-Strike 2 14 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 56 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 7 no data
Dota 2 42 no data
Far Cry 5 16 no data
Fortnite 22 no data
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 5 14−16 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 15 no data
Metro Exodus 8 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16 no data
Valorant 73 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 19 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 8 no data
Dota 2 40 no data
Far Cry 5 16 no data
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11 no data
Valorant 19 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35 no data

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8 no data
Metro Exodus 5−6 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 no data
Valorant 49 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Far Cry 5 10−12 no data
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12 no data

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 no data
Metro Exodus 0−1 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 no data
Valorant 22 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Dota 2 19 no data
Far Cry 5 6−7 no data
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 6−7 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2020 28 June 2000
Chip lithography 7 nm 180 nm

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) has an age advantage of 19 years, and a 2471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and GeForce2 MX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is a notebook card while GeForce2 MX is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
NVIDIA GeForce2 MX
GeForce2 MX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 716 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 17 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) or GeForce2 MX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.