HD Graphics P630 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Place in performance ranking	733	718
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.02
Architecture	Vega (2017−2021)	Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake (2015−2017)
GPU code name	Vega Raven Ridge	Kaby-Lake-H-GT2
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	7 January 2018 (6 years ago)	5 August 2016 (7 years ago)
Current price	no data	$1449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	24
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz	1100 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	26.40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and HD Graphics P630 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x1
Width	no data	IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	no data	1740 MB
Memory bus width	no data	64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	System Shared
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_1	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.4
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.1
Vulkan	no data	1.1.103

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

15
+7.1%

14−16

−7.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

6−7

+0%

6−7

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8 +60%	5−6 −60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8	0−1
Battlefield 5	12 +71.4%	7−8 −71.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −8.3%	12−14 +8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	8 +60%	5−6 −60%
Forza Horizon 4	10 +25%	8−9 −25%
Hitman 3	13 +117%	6−7 −117%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9 +80%	5−6 −80%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9 +350%	2−3 −350%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7	0−1
Battlefield 5	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −8.3%	12−14 +8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Forza Horizon 4	9 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Hitman 3	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Metro Exodus	3 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	3 −233%	10−11 +233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Battlefield 5	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Hitman 3	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	1−2
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Hitman 3	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%

This is how RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and HD Graphics P630 compete in popular games:

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is 7% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is 350% faster than the HD Graphics P630.
in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the HD Graphics P630 is 233% faster than the RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000).

All in all, in popular games: