GeForce GTX 1630 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
2018
3.03

GeForce GTX 1630 outperforms Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) by a whopping 325% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking733363
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data12.62
ArchitectureVega (2017−2021)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeTU117
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2018 (6 years ago)28 June 2022 (1 year ago)
Current priceno data$213

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384512
Boost clock speed1100 MHz1785 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data57.12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and GeForce GTX 1630 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data12 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkanno data1.3
CUDAno data7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD15
−300%
60−65
+300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8
−275%
30−33
+275%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8
−275%
30−33
+275%
Battlefield 5 12
−317%
50−55
+317%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−317%
50−55
+317%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Far Cry New Dawn 8
−275%
30−33
+275%
Forza Horizon 4 10
−300%
40−45
+300%
Hitman 3 13
−323%
55−60
+323%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9
−289%
35−40
+289%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7
−286%
27−30
+286%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9
−289%
35−40
+289%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7
−286%
27−30
+286%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−317%
50−55
+317%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 9
−289%
35−40
+289%
Hitman 3 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Metro Exodus 3
−300%
12−14
+300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3
−300%
12−14
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
−289%
35−40
+289%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
−300%
24−27
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Hitman 3 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Hitman 3 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%

This is how RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and GTX 1630 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1630 is 300% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.03 12.88
Recency 7 January 2018 28 June 2022
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 75 Watt

The GeForce GTX 1630 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 1630 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
GeForce GTX 1630

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 55 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1117 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.