ATI Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition vs RX Vega 56

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking198not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.20no data
Power efficiency11.38no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameVega 10R360
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date14 August 2017 (8 years ago)4 March 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584no data
Core clock speed1156 MHz378 MHz
Boost clock speed1471 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)210 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate329.53.024
Floating-point processing power10.54 TFLOPSno data
ROPs648
TMUs2248
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP Pro 8x
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB128 MB
Memory bus width2048 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz338 MHz
Memory bandwidth409.6 GB/s21.63 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort2x DVI
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.1.125N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 August 2017 4 March 2004
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 210 Watt 60 Watt

RX Vega 56 has an age advantage of 13 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9800 PRO Mac Edition, on the other hand, has 250% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 56 and Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Radeon RX Vega 56
ATI Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition
Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 954 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 56 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 2 votes

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 56 or Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.