ATI Radeon 9200 PRO vs RX Vega 56

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	200	1599
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	18.13	no data
Power efficiency	11.39	no data
Architecture	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)	Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code name	Vega 10	RV280
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	14 August 2017 (8 years ago)	1 May 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$399	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3584	no data
Core clock speed	1156 MHz	239 MHz
Boost clock speed	1471 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	12,500 million	36 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	210 Watt	28 Watt
Texture fill rate	329.5	0.96
Floating-point processing power	10.54 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	64	4
TMUs	224	4
L1 Cache	896 KB	no data
L2 Cache	4 MB	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	AGP 8x
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	128 MB
Memory bus width	2048 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	164 MHz
Memory bandwidth	409.6 GB/s	5.248 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI	+	-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	8.1
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	1.4
OpenCL	2.0	N/A
Vulkan	1.1.125	N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	115	no data
1440p	77	no data
4K	50	no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.47	no data
1440p	5.18	no data
4K	7.98	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	14 August 2017	1 May 2003
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	128 MB
Chip lithography	14 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	210 Watt	28 Watt

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---