GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a vs Radeon RX Vega 56

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking198not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.20no data
Power efficiency11.39no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameVega 10C78
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date14 August 2017 (8 years ago)6 May 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores358416
Core clock speed1156 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1471 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)210 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate329.54.000
Floating-point processing power10.54 TFLOPS0.0384 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs2248
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width2048 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth409.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.1.125N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 August 2017 6 May 2008
Chip lithography 14 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 210 Watt 40 Watt

RX Vega 56 has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

8100 + nForce 720a, on the other hand, has 425% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 56 and GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Radeon RX Vega 56
NVIDIA GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a
GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 952 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 56 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 18 votes

Rate GeForce 8100 nForce 720a on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 56 or GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.