T400 vs Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated469
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.66
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameVega 10TU117
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 June 2018 (6 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584384
Core clock speed1138 MHz420 MHz
Boost clock speed1301 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate291.434.20
Floating-point processing power9.326 TFLOPS1.094 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs22424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth409.6 GB/s80 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort3x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2018 6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 30 Watt

RX Vega 56 Mobile has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile and T400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile is a notebook card while T400 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
NVIDIA T400
T400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 5 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 375 votes

Rate T400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.