Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs RX Vega 5

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 5 with Radeon RX 7650 GRE, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 5
2020
15 Watt
4.48

RX 7650 GRE outperforms RX Vega 5 by a whopping 853% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking691108
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data84.92
Power efficiency21.2418.41
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameVegaNavi 33
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2020 (5 years ago)February 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$279

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3202048
Core clock speedno data1720 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHz2695 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt165 Watt
Texture fill rateno data345.0
Floating-point processing powerno data22.08 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data204 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD19
−847%
180−190
+847%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data1.55

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 43
−830%
400−450
+830%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
−844%
85−90
+844%
Dead Island 2 18
−844%
170−180
+844%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 22
−809%
200−210
+809%
Counter-Strike 2 29
−831%
270−280
+831%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−844%
85−90
+844%
Dead Island 2 15
−833%
140−150
+833%
Far Cry 5 15
−833%
140−150
+833%
Fortnite 52
−765%
450−500
+765%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−850%
190−200
+850%
Forza Horizon 5 17
−841%
160−170
+841%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−841%
160−170
+841%
Valorant 55−60
−777%
500−550
+777%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18
−844%
170−180
+844%
Counter-Strike 2 7
−829%
65−70
+829%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50
−800%
450−500
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−844%
85−90
+844%
Dead Island 2 11
−809%
100−105
+809%
Dota 2 39
−797%
350−400
+797%
Far Cry 5 12
−817%
110−120
+817%
Fortnite 21
−852%
200−210
+852%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−850%
190−200
+850%
Forza Horizon 5 15
−833%
140−150
+833%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
−823%
120−130
+823%
Metro Exodus 4
−775%
35−40
+775%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−841%
160−170
+841%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
−829%
130−140
+829%
Valorant 55−60
−777%
500−550
+777%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16
−838%
150−160
+838%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−844%
85−90
+844%
Dead Island 2 14−16
−829%
130−140
+829%
Dota 2 37
−846%
350−400
+846%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−823%
120−130
+823%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−850%
190−200
+850%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−841%
160−170
+841%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
−844%
85−90
+844%
Valorant 55−60
−777%
500−550
+777%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12
−817%
110−120
+817%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−817%
55−60
+817%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−809%
300−310
+809%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
−833%
280−290
+833%
Valorant 45−50
−751%
400−450
+751%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Dead Island 2 8−9
−838%
75−80
+838%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−838%
75−80
+838%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−850%
95−100
+850%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−817%
55−60
+817%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
−838%
75−80
+838%

4K
High Preset

Dead Island 2 6−7
−817%
55−60
+817%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−841%
160−170
+841%
Valorant 21−24
−809%
200−210
+809%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Dead Island 2 6−7
−817%
55−60
+817%
Dota 2 14−16
−829%
130−140
+829%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%

This is how RX Vega 5 and RX 7650 GRE compete in popular games:

  • RX 7650 GRE is 847% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.48 42.71
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 165 Watt

RX Vega 5 has 1000% lower power consumption.

RX 7650 GRE, on the other hand, has a 853.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7650 GRE is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 5 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 5 is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7650 GRE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 5
Radeon RX Vega 5
AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE
Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 227 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 11 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7650 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 5 or Radeon RX 7650 GRE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.