GeForce4 MX 440 vs Radeon RX Vega 5

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 5 with GeForce4 MX 440, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 5
2020
15 Watt
4.47
+44600%

RX Vega 5 outperforms GeForce4 MX 440 by a whopping 44600% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6551514
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.33no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameVegaNV17 A3
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2020 (5 years ago)6 February 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Core clock speedno data275 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data29 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data1.100
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data64 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_18.0
OpenGLno data1.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD19-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 9 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 21 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 12 0−1
Metro Exodus 10−12 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 18 0−1
Valorant 18 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 0−1
Dota 2 21 0−1
Far Cry 5 21 0−1
Fortnite 27−30 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 17 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 8−9 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 13 0−1
Metro Exodus 10−12 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 41 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 0−1
Valorant 12−14 0−1
World of Tanks 50 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 0−1
Dota 2 37 0−1
Far Cry 5 21−24 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 14 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 8−9 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45 0−1
Valorant 12−14 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 4−5 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1
World of Tanks 30−35 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−11 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 6−7 0−1
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 0−1
Valorant 12−14 0−1

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12 0−1
Dota 2 16−18 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 0−1
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 10−12 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 16−18 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Fortnite 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 0−1
Valorant 4−5 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.47 0.01
Recency 7 January 2020 6 February 2002
Chip lithography 7 nm 150 nm

RX Vega 5 has a 44600% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, and a 2042.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX Vega 5 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 MX 440 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 5 is a notebook card while GeForce4 MX 440 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 5
Radeon RX Vega 5
NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 440
GeForce4 MX 440

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 218 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 259 votes

Rate GeForce4 MX 440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.