Radeon HD 8950M vs RX Vega 3

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking776not rated
Place by popularity78not in top-100
Power efficiency13.81no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code namePicassoSaturn
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2019 (5 years ago)14 May 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192768
Core clock speed300 MHz1075 MHz
Boost clock speed1001 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate12.0151.60
Floating-point processing power0.3844 TFLOPS1.651 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs1248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1375 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data88 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2019 14 May 2013
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 100 Watt

RX Vega 3 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 3 and Radeon HD 8950M. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
Radeon RX Vega 3
AMD Radeon HD 8950M
Radeon HD 8950M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1953 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 19 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8950M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.