RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Radeon RX Vega 3

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 3 with RTX 2000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 3
2019
15 Watt
2.98

RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms RX Vega 3 by a whopping 1420% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking79078
Place by popularity74not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data88.92
Power efficiency13.6644.49
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code namePicassoAD107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 January 2019 (6 years ago)12 February 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1922816
Core clock speed300 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speed1001 MHz2130 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate12.01187.4
Floating-point processing power0.3844 TFLOPS12 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs1288
Tensor Coresno data88
Ray Tracing Coresno data22

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega 3 2.98
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 45.30
+1420%

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega 3 1149
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 17453
+1419%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12
−1400%
180−190
+1400%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.61

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−1344%
130−140
+1344%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1400%
90−95
+1400%
Atomic Heart 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
Battlefield 5 7
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−1344%
130−140
+1344%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1400%
90−95
+1400%
Far Cry 5 5
−1400%
75−80
+1400%
Fortnite 14
−1400%
210−220
+1400%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1400%
210−220
+1400%
Forza Horizon 5 8
−1400%
120−130
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1362%
190−200
+1362%
Valorant 45−50
−1344%
650−700
+1344%
Atomic Heart 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
Battlefield 5 9−10
−1344%
130−140
+1344%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−1344%
130−140
+1344%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 23
−1204%
300−310
+1204%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1400%
90−95
+1400%
Dota 2 21
−1329%
300−310
+1329%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1400%
75−80
+1400%
Fortnite 14−16
−1400%
210−220
+1400%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1400%
210−220
+1400%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
−1400%
60−65
+1400%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
−1344%
130−140
+1344%
Metro Exodus 2
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1362%
190−200
+1362%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
−1400%
90−95
+1400%
Valorant 45−50
−1344%
650−700
+1344%
Battlefield 5 9−10
−1344%
130−140
+1344%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−1344%
130−140
+1344%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1400%
90−95
+1400%
Dota 2 19
−1374%
280−290
+1374%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1400%
75−80
+1400%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1400%
210−220
+1400%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
−1400%
60−65
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1362%
190−200
+1362%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
−1400%
60−65
+1400%
Valorant 45−50
−1344%
650−700
+1344%
Fortnite 14−16
−1400%
210−220
+1400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 20−22
−1400%
300−310
+1400%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−1329%
300−310
+1329%
Valorant 27−30
−1381%
400−450
+1381%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−1400%
60−65
+1400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1400%
75−80
+1400%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1400%
75−80
+1400%
Fortnite 5−6
−1400%
75−80
+1400%
Atomic Heart 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1367%
220−230
+1367%
Valorant 14−16
−1400%
210−220
+1400%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Dota 2 8−9
−1400%
120−130
+1400%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%
Fortnite 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%

This is how RX Vega 3 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 1400% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.98 45.30
Recency 6 January 2019 12 February 2024
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 70 Watt

RX Vega 3 has 366.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 1420.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 3 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 3 is a notebook card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
Radeon RX Vega 3
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5
2047 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1
29 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 3 or RTX 2000 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.