Radeon RX 5700 vs RX Vega 11

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

RX Vega 11
2017
65 Watt
5.49

RX 5700 outperforms RX Vega 11 by a whopping 583% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking574114
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.7379.99
ArchitectureVega (2017−2021)Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeNavi 10
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date26 October 2017 (6 years ago)7 July 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349
Current price$475 $116 (0.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 5700 has 10858% better value for money than RX Vega 11.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7042304
Core clock speedno data1465 MHz
Boost clock speed1240 MHz1725 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt180 Watt
Texture fill rate61.60248.4
Floating-point performance1,760 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data268 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared14000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 11 5.49
RX 5700 37.49
+583%

RX 5700 outperforms RX Vega 11 by 583% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX Vega 11 2120
RX 5700 14479
+583%

RX 5700 outperforms RX Vega 11 by 583% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX Vega 11 5483
RX 5700 31470
+474%

RX 5700 outperforms RX Vega 11 by 474% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX Vega 11 3494
RX 5700 23746
+580%

RX 5700 outperforms RX Vega 11 by 580% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX Vega 11 20848
RX 5700 132911
+538%

RX 5700 outperforms RX Vega 11 by 538% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

RX Vega 11 157382
RX 5700 489113
+211%

RX 5700 outperforms RX Vega 11 by 211% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD29
−290%
113
+290%
1440p6
−1017%
67
+1017%
4K12
−258%
43
+258%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6 no data
Battlefield 5 23 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Far Cry 5 22 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 25 no data
Forza Horizon 4 38 no data
Hitman 3 10−11 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30 no data
Metro Exodus 33 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6 no data
Battlefield 5 14−16 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Far Cry 5 19 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 19 no data
Forza Horizon 4 78 no data
Hitman 3 10−11 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30 no data
Metro Exodus 8 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 11 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Far Cry 5 14 no data
Forza Horizon 4 29 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 15 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Far Cry 5 8−9 no data
Forza Horizon 4 9−10 no data
Hitman 3 10−11 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14 no data
Metro Exodus 4−5 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5 no data
Hitman 3 2−3 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Far Cry 5 3−4 no data
Forza Horizon 4 12 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7 no data
Metro Exodus 7−8 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 no data

This is how RX Vega 11 and RX 5700 compete in popular games:

  • RX 5700 is 290% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5700 is 1017% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5700 is 258% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.49 37.49
Recency 26 October 2017 7 July 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 180 Watt

The Radeon RX 5700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 11 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Radeon RX Vega 11
AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1696 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1552 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.