Radeon HD 8330E vs RX Vega 11

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 11 with Radeon HD 8330E, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 11
2018
35 Watt
5.49
+707%

RX Vega 11 outperforms HD 8330E by a whopping 707% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6111183
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.823.13
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameRavenKalindi
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date10 May 2018 (6 years ago)23 April 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores704128
Core clock speed300 MHz497 MHz
Boost clock speed1251 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate55.043.976
Floating-point processing power1.761 TFLOPS0.1272 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPIGP
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.0
Vulkan1.31.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 11 5.49
+707%
HD 8330E 0.68

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega 11 2109
+705%
HD 8330E 262

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD28
+833%
3−4
−833%
1440p50−1
4K12
+1100%
1−2
−1100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Forza Horizon 4 20
+900%
2−3
−900%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Metro Exodus 18
+800%
2−3
−800%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Valorant 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Dota 2 27
+800%
3−4
−800%
Far Cry 5 30
+900%
3−4
−900%
Fortnite 30−35
+967%
3−4
−967%
Forza Horizon 4 17
+750%
2−3
−750%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
+750%
2−3
−750%
Metro Exodus 11
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 54
+800%
6−7
−800%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Valorant 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
World of Tanks 85−90
+780%
10−11
−780%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Dota 2 42
+740%
5−6
−740%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+767%
3−4
−767%
Forza Horizon 4 15
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+820%
5−6
−820%
Valorant 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 5−6 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+775%
4−5
−775%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5 0−1
World of Tanks 35−40
+875%
4−5
−875%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+933%
3−4
−933%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9 0−1
Metro Exodus 5−6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 0−1
Valorant 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 15
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 17
+750%
2−3
−750%
Far Cry 5 6−7 0−1
Fortnite 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 3−4 0−1
Valorant 5−6 0−1

This is how RX Vega 11 and HD 8330E compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 11 is 833% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega 11 is 1100% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.49 0.68
Recency 10 May 2018 23 April 2013
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

RX Vega 11 has a 707.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

HD 8330E, on the other hand, has 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega 11 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8330E in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 11 is a desktop card while Radeon HD 8330E is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Radeon RX Vega 11
AMD Radeon HD 8330E
Radeon HD 8330E

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1820 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8330E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.