GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES vs Radeon RX Vega 3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking829not rated
Place by popularity92not in top-100
Power efficiency13.91no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code namePicassoGF114
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2019 (6 years ago)24 September 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192336
Core clock speed300 MHz779 MHz
Boost clock speed1001 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate12.0143.62
Floating-point processing power0.3844 TFLOPS1.046 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs1256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data210 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1280 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1002 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.3 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2019 24 September 2011
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 160 Watt

RX Vega 3 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 966.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 3 and GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 3 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
Radeon RX Vega 3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES
GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2176 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 15 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 3 or GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.