Tesla M2050 vs Radeon RX Vega 10
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 642 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.19 | no data |
| Architecture | Vega (2017−2021) | Fermi (2010−2014) |
| GPU code name | Vega Raven Ridge | GF100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 26 October 2017 (6 years ago) | 25 July 2011 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $2,699 |
| Current price | $449 | $1399 (0.5x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 640 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 575 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4,940 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 52.00 | 32.20 |
| Floating-point performance | no data | 1,030.4 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Radeon RX Vega 10 and Tesla M2050 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 248 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 3 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 3092 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 148.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 26 October 2017 | 25 July 2011 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 225 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 10 and Tesla M2050. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 10 is a notebook card while Tesla M2050 is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
