Radeon Instinct MI200 vs RX 7950 XTX

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)CDNA 2.0 (2021)
GPU code nameNavi 31Aldebaran
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)December 2021 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores61446656
Core clock speed2200 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed3300 MHz1700 MHz
Number of transistors57,700 million58,200 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)355 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate1,267707.2
Floating-point processing power81.1 TFLOPS22.63 TFLOPS
ROPs192no data
TMUs384416
Ray Tracing Cores96no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length287 mmno data
Width2-slotOAM Module
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount24 GB64 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth960.0 GB/s1,638 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.7N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 64 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 355 Watt 300 Watt

RX 7950 XTX has a 20% more advanced lithography process.

Instinct MI200, on the other hand, has a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 18.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 7950 XTX and Radeon Instinct MI200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7950 XTX is a desktop card while Radeon Instinct MI200 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX
Radeon RX 7950 XTX
AMD Radeon Instinct MI200
Radeon Instinct MI200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 188 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7950 XTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 4 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.