Arc A380M vs Radeon RX 7950 XT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 31DG2-128
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)24 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores53761024
Core clock speed2000 MHz1550 MHz
Boost clock speed3000 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors57,700 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate1,008128.0
Floating-point processing power64.51 TFLOPS4.096 TFLOPS
ROPs19232
TMUs33664
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Cores848

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16MXM-A (3.1)
Length276 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount20 GB6 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz1937 MHz
Memory bandwidth800.0 GB/s186.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-CPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 20 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 35 Watt

RX 7950 XT has a 233.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

Arc A380M, on the other hand, has 757.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 7950 XT and Arc A380M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7950 XT is a desktop card while Arc A380M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT
Radeon RX 7950 XT
Intel Arc A380M
Arc A380M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 48 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7950 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 8 votes

Rate Arc A380M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.