Riva TNT2 vs Radeon RX 7900 XTX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7900 XTX and Riva TNT2, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 7900 XTX
2022
24 GB GDDR6, 355 Watt
80.59
+805800%

RX 7900 XTX outperforms Riva TNT2 by a whopping 805800% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking81518
Place by popularity51not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation34.71no data
Power efficiency15.61no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Fahrenheit (1998−2000)
GPU code nameNavi 31NV5
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date3 November 2022 (2 years ago)12 October 1999 (25 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6144no data
Core clock speed1929 MHz125 MHz
Boost clock speed2498 MHzno data
Number of transistors57,700 million15 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)355 Wattno data
Texture fill rate959.20.25
Floating-point processing power61.39 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1922
TMUs3842
Ray Tracing Cores96no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16AGP 4x
Length287 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6SDR
Maximum RAM amount24 GB16 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz150 MHz
Memory bandwidth960.0 GB/s2.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C1x VGA
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)6.0
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL2.2N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7900 XTX 80.59
+805800%
Riva TNT2 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7900 XTX 31037
+1034467%
Riva TNT2 3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD252-0−1
1440p171-0−1
4K105-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.96no data
1440p5.84no data
4K9.51no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 242 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 166 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 283 0−1
Battlefield 5 240−250 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 231 0−1
Far Cry 5 110−120 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 200−210 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 250−260 0−1
Hitman 3 120−130 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 280−290 0−1
Metro Exodus 150−160 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 350−400 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 330 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 241 0−1
Battlefield 5 240−250 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 208 0−1
Far Cry 5 110−120 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 200−210 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 250−260 0−1
Hitman 3 120−130 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 280−290 0−1
Metro Exodus 150−160 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 535 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 134 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 210 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 199 0−1
Far Cry 5 110−120 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 295 0−1
Hitman 3 120−130 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 406 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 471 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 298 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 158 0−1

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 132 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 171 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 141 0−1
Far Cry 5 80−85 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 270−280 0−1
Hitman 3 110−120 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 328 0−1
Metro Exodus 146 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 360 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 238 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 240−250 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130 0−1

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70 0−1
Hitman 3 70−75 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230 0−1
Metro Exodus 130−140 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 182 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 107 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 71 0−1
Far Cry 5 50−55 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 227 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 197 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 103 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 80.59 0.01
Recency 3 November 2022 12 October 1999
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 16 MB
Chip lithography 5 nm 250 nm

RX 7900 XTX has a 805800% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 23 years, a 153500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 4900% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7900 XTX is our recommended choice as it beats the Riva TNT2 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
NVIDIA Riva TNT2
Riva TNT2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 3742 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 XTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 19 votes

Rate Riva TNT2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.