GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs Radeon RX 7800M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7800M and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 7800M
2024
12 GB GDDR6, 180 Watt
32.52
+17%

RX 7800M outperforms GTX 1660 Ti Mobile by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking173209
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data100.00
Power efficiency12.7824.57
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 32TU116
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date11 September 2024 (less than a year ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38401536
Core clock speed1295 MHz1455 MHz
Boost clock speed2335 MHz1590 MHz
Number of transistors28,100 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate560.4152.6
Floating-point processing power35.87 TFLOPS4.884 TFLOPS
ROPs9648
TMUs24096
Ray Tracing Cores60no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB6 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth432.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.21.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
+13.6%
88
−13.6%
1440p65−70
+12.1%
58
−12.1%
4K40−45
+14.3%
35
−14.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.60
1440pno data3.95
4Kno data6.54

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 147
+0%
147
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 86
+0%
86
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 74
+0%
74
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 111
+0%
111
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 133
+0%
133
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 68
+0%
68
+0%
Far Cry 5 93
+0%
93
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 134
+0%
134
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100
+0%
100
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 62
+0%
62
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Valorant 209
+0%
209
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 103
+0%
103
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 101
+0%
101
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+0%
54
+0%
Dota 2 121
+0%
121
+0%
Far Cry 5 89
+0%
89
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 125
+0%
125
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 90
+0%
90
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 105
+0%
105
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 48
+0%
48
+0%
Metro Exodus 54
+0%
54
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
+0%
103
+0%
Valorant 207
+0%
207
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 94
+0%
94
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+0%
52
+0%
Dota 2 116
+0%
116
+0%
Far Cry 5 83
+0%
83
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 99
+0%
99
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 35
+0%
35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 109
+0%
109
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55
+0%
55
+0%
Valorant 125
+0%
125
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 107
+0%
107
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 30
+0%
30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 197
+0%
197
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 69
+0%
69
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+0%
25
+0%
Far Cry 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 69
+0%
69
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 19
+0%
19
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
+0%
35
+0%
Valorant 152
+0%
152
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+0%
10
+0%
Dota 2 85
+0%
85
+0%
Far Cry 5 31
+0%
31
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

This is how RX 7800M and GTX 1660 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RX 7800M is 14% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7800M is 12% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7800M is 14% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.52 27.79
Recency 11 September 2024 23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 80 Watt

RX 7800M has a 17% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has 125% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7800M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7800M
Radeon RX 7800M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 4 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1640 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 7800M or GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.