GeForce MX450 25W vs Radeon RX 7800M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking115not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.70no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 32TU117
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date11 September 2024 (less than a year ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3840896
Core clock speed1295 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speed2335 MHz930 MHz
Number of transistors28,100 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate560.452.08
Floating-point processing power35.87 TFLOPS1.667 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs24056
Ray Tracing Cores60no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB2 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth432.0 GB/s80 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.21.2
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 September 2024 15 August 2020
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 25 Watt

RX 7800M has an age advantage of 4 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

MX450 25W, on the other hand, has 620% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 7800M and GeForce MX450 25W. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7800M
Radeon RX 7800M
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W
GeForce MX450 25W

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 12 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 27 votes

Rate GeForce MX450 25W on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 7800M or GeForce MX450 25W, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.