Arc Graphics 130V vs Radeon RX 7700 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7700 XT with Arc Graphics 130V, including specs and performance data.

RX 7700 XT
2023
12 GB GDDR6, 245 Watt
58.34
+402%

RX 7700 XT outperforms Arc Graphics 130V by a whopping 402% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking41414
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation71.26no data
Power efficiency16.47no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Xe² (2024)
GPU code nameNavi 32Lunar Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date25 August 2023 (1 year ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$449 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores34567
Core clock speed1435 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2544 MHz1850 MHz
Number of transistors28,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)245 Wattno data
Texture fill rate549.5no data
Floating-point processing power35.17 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs216no data
Ray Tracing Cores54no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount12 GB16 GB
Memory bus width192 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth432.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-Cno data
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.2no data
Vulkan1.3-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7700 XT 58.34
+402%
Arc Graphics 130V 11.61

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7700 XT 22445
+402%
Arc Graphics 130V 4467

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 7700 XT 57340
+502%
Arc Graphics 130V 9523

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 7700 XT 42801
+418%
Arc Graphics 130V 8255

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD188
+488%
32
−488%
1440p103
+472%
18−21
−472%
4K60
+500%
10−12
−500%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.39no data
1440p4.36no data
4K7.48no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 193
+451%
35−40
−451%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 165
+450%
30−33
−450%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 180
+414%
35−40
−414%
Battlefield 5 180−190
+423%
35−40
−423%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+419%
21−24
−419%
Cyberpunk 2077 158
+427%
30−33
−427%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+419%
21−24
−419%
Far Cry New Dawn 130−140
+415%
27−30
−415%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+460%
40−45
−460%
Hitman 3 110−120
+462%
21−24
−462%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+448%
40−45
−448%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+410%
30−33
−410%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+443%
21−24
−443%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 230−240
+413%
45−50
−413%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+444%
27−30
−444%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 272
+444%
50−55
−444%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 149
+452%
27−30
−452%
Battlefield 5 180−190
+423%
35−40
−423%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+419%
21−24
−419%
Cyberpunk 2077 132
+450%
24−27
−450%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+419%
21−24
−419%
Far Cry New Dawn 130−140
+415%
27−30
−415%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+460%
40−45
−460%
Hitman 3 110−120
+462%
21−24
−462%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+448%
40−45
−448%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+410%
30−33
−410%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+443%
21−24
−443%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 334
+414%
65−70
−414%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+471%
21−24
−471%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+444%
27−30
−444%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 121
+404%
24−27
−404%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 132
+450%
24−27
−450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+419%
21−24
−419%
Cyberpunk 2077 122
+408%
24−27
−408%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+419%
21−24
−419%
Forza Horizon 4 231
+413%
45−50
−413%
Hitman 3 110−120
+462%
21−24
−462%
Horizon Zero Dawn 216
+440%
40−45
−440%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 287
+422%
55−60
−422%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 168
+460%
30−33
−460%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+444%
27−30
−444%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+443%
21−24
−443%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
+417%
24−27
−417%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
+463%
16−18
−463%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 98
+444%
18−20
−444%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 101
+461%
18−20
−461%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+467%
12−14
−467%
Cyberpunk 2077 80
+471%
14−16
−471%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+458%
12−14
−458%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+440%
50−55
−440%
Hitman 3 80−85
+406%
16−18
−406%
Horizon Zero Dawn 171
+470%
30−33
−470%
Metro Exodus 134
+458%
24−27
−458%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 193
+451%
35−40
−451%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120
+471%
21−24
−471%
Watch Dogs: Legion 220−230
+409%
45−50
−409%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+444%
18−20
−444%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+442%
12−14
−442%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+440%
10−11
−440%
Hitman 3 45−50
+444%
9−10
−444%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+445%
40−45
−445%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+425%
16−18
−425%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 89
+456%
16−18
−456%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 58
+480%
10−11
−480%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 59
+490%
10−11
−490%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+413%
8−9
−413%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
+414%
7−8
−414%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+443%
7−8
−443%
Forza Horizon 4 134
+458%
24−27
−458%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 97
+439%
18−20
−439%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+467%
6−7
−467%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+470%
10−11
−470%

This is how RX 7700 XT and Arc Graphics 130V compete in popular games:

  • RX 7700 XT is 488% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7700 XT is 472% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7700 XT is 500% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 58.34 11.61
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 3 nm

RX 7700 XT has a 402.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc Graphics 130V, on the other hand, has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Graphics 130V in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7700 XT is a desktop card while Arc Graphics 130V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
Radeon RX 7700 XT
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
Arc Graphics 130V

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1591 vote

Rate Radeon RX 7700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 8 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 130V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.