Radeon R7 260 vs RX 7600
Aggregated performance score
RX 7600 outperforms R7 260 by 463% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 83 | 498 |
| Place by popularity | 76 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 37.60 | 1.02 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 (2022) | GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) |
| GPU code name | Navi 33 | Bonaire |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | no data | reference |
| Release date | 24 May 2023 (less than a year ago) | 17 December 2013 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $269 | $109 |
| Current price | $352 (1.3x MSRP) | $205 (1.9x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
RX 7600 has 3586% better value for money than R7 260.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 1720 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2655 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 13,300 million | 2,080 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 165 Watt | 115 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 339.8 | 48.00 |
| Floating-point performance | no data | 1,536 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | no data | PCIe 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 204 mm | 170 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1 x 6-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 18000 MHz | 1625 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 104 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Eyefinity | no data | 1 |
| HDMI | + | + |
| DisplayPort support | no data | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| AppAcceleration | no data | - |
| Enduro | no data | - |
| FreeSync | no data | 1 |
| HD3D | no data | - |
| PowerTune | no data | - |
| TrueAudio | no data | - |
| ZeroCore | no data | - |
| DDMA audio | no data | + |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | DirectX® 12 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | no data |
| Mantle | no data | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
RX 7600 outperforms R7 260 by 463% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
RX 7600 outperforms R7 260 by 463% in Passmark.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
RX 7600 outperforms R7 260 by 640% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 144
+500%
| 24−27
−500%
|
| 1440p | 74
+517%
| 12−14
−517%
|
| 4K | 39
+550%
| 6−7
−550%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 148
+517%
|
24−27
−517%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 70−75
+508%
|
12−14
−508%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 70−75
+508%
|
12−14
−508%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 110−120
+467%
|
21−24
−467%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 110−120
+539%
|
18−20
−539%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 117
+550%
|
18−20
−550%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 183
+510%
|
30−33
−510%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 161
+496%
|
27−30
−496%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 120−130
+500%
|
21−24
−500%
|
| Hitman 3 | 130−140
+538%
|
21−24
−538%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 90−95
+469%
|
16−18
−469%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 65−70
+467%
|
12−14
−467%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 181
+503%
|
30−33
−503%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 75−80
+542%
|
12−14
−542%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 70−75
+508%
|
12−14
−508%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 70−75
+508%
|
12−14
−508%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 110−120
+467%
|
21−24
−467%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 110−120
+539%
|
18−20
−539%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 100
+525%
|
16−18
−525%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 174
+480%
|
30−33
−480%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 154
+470%
|
27−30
−470%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 120−130
+500%
|
21−24
−500%
|
| Hitman 3 | 130−140
+538%
|
21−24
−538%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 90−95
+469%
|
16−18
−469%
|
| Metro Exodus | 113
+528%
|
18−20
−528%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 65−70
+467%
|
12−14
−467%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 155
+474%
|
27−30
−474%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 210
+500%
|
35−40
−500%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 75−80
+542%
|
12−14
−542%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 70−75
+508%
|
12−14
−508%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 70−75
+508%
|
12−14
−508%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 110−120
+467%
|
21−24
−467%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 90
+543%
|
14−16
−543%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 163
+504%
|
27−30
−504%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 138
+475%
|
24−27
−475%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 120−130
+500%
|
21−24
−500%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 123
+486%
|
21−24
−486%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 75−80
+542%
|
12−14
−542%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 70−75
+492%
|
12−14
−492%
|
| Hitman 3 | 80−85
+471%
|
14−16
−471%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 60−65
+500%
|
10−11
−500%
|
| Metro Exodus | 65
+550%
|
10−11
−550%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 30−35
+467%
|
6−7
−467%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 89
+536%
|
14−16
−536%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 45−50
+475%
|
8−9
−475%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 45−50
+488%
|
8−9
−488%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 85−90
+521%
|
14−16
−521%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 56
+522%
|
9−10
−522%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 115
+539%
|
18−20
−539%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 118
+556%
|
18−20
−556%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 85−90
+536%
|
14−16
−536%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 86
+514%
|
14−16
−514%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 35−40
+550%
|
6−7
−550%
|
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 35−40
+550%
|
6−7
−550%
|
| Hitman 3 | 40−45
+514%
|
7−8
−514%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 30−35
+467%
|
6−7
−467%
|
| Metro Exodus | 38
+533%
|
6−7
−533%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 21−24
+475%
|
4−5
−475%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 42
+500%
|
7−8
−500%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 59
+490%
|
10−11
−490%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 27−30
+480%
|
5−6
−480%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 27−30
+575%
|
4−5
−575%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 50−55
+467%
|
9−10
−467%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24
+500%
|
4−5
−500%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 57
+470%
|
10−11
−470%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 62
+520%
|
10−11
−520%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
+490%
|
10−11
−490%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 21−24
+633%
|
3−4
−633%
|
This is how RX 7600 and R7 260 compete in popular games:
- RX 7600 is 500% faster than R7 260 in 1080p
- RX 7600 is 517% faster than R7 260 in 1440p
- RX 7600 is 550% faster than R7 260 in 4K
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 42.07 | 7.47 |
| Recency | 24 May 2023 | 17 December 2013 |
| Cost | $269 | $109 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 165 Watt | 115 Watt |
The Radeon RX 7600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 260 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
