3dfx Voodoo5 6000 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 16 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 34.37 | no data |
| Architecture | Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022) | Voodoo Scalable (2000) |
| GPU code name | Navi | VSA-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 10 May 2022 (2 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,099 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 5120 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 1925 MHz | 166 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2324 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 26,800 million | 14 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 250 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 335 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 743.7 | 0.33 |
| Floating-point processing power | 23.8 gflops | no data |
| ROPs | 128 | 2 |
| TMUs | 320 | 2 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | AGP 4x |
| Length | 267 mm | no data |
| Width | 3-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | SDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 32 MB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 18000 MHz | 166 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 576.0 GB/s | 2.656 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x VGA |
| HDMI | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 6.0 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | N/A |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | N/A |
Pros & cons summary
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 32 MB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 250 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 335 Watt | 60 Watt |
RX 6950 XT has a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 3471.4% more advanced lithography process.
3dfx Voodoo5 6000, on the other hand, has 458.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6950 XT and 3dfx Voodoo5 6000. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
