T1000 8 GB vs Radeon RX 6900 XT

Place in performance ranking	18	265
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	21.44	6.66
Architecture	Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Navi 21	TU117
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	8 December 2020 (3 years ago)	6 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$999	no data
Current price	$957 (1x MSRP)	$690

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6900 XT has 222% better value for money than T1000 8 GB.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	5120	896
Core clock speed	1825 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2250 MHz	1395 MHz
Number of transistors	26,800 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	720.0	78.12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	3-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	16000 MHz	10 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	512.0 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	4x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6900 XT 69.49
+254%

T1000 8 GB 19.64

Radeon RX 6900 XT outperforms T1000 8 GB by 254% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 6900 XT 26863
+254%

T1000 8 GB 7592

Radeon RX 6900 XT outperforms T1000 8 GB by 254% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	202 +267%	55−60 −267%
1440p	129 +269%	35−40 −269%
4K	89 +271%	24−27 −271%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

130−140

+286%

35−40
−286%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	117 +290%	30−33 −290%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	169 +276%	45−50 −276%
Battlefield 5	220−230 +270%	60−65 −270%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	140−150 +260%	40−45 −260%
Cyberpunk 2077	130−140 +286%	35−40 −286%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +263%	30−33 −263%
Far Cry New Dawn	140−150 +303%	35−40 −303%
Forza Horizon 4	283 +277%	75−80 −277%
Hitman 3	283 +277%	75−80 −277%
Horizon Zero Dawn	442 +268%	120−130 −268%
Metro Exodus	130−140 +277%	35−40 −277%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +254%	35−40 −254%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	280−290 +256%	80−85 −256%
Watch Dogs: Legion	190 +280%	50−55 −280%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	106 +293%	27−30 −293%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	142 +255%	40−45 −255%
Battlefield 5	220−230 +270%	60−65 −270%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	140−150 +260%	40−45 −260%
Cyberpunk 2077	130−140 +286%	35−40 −286%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +263%	30−33 −263%
Far Cry New Dawn	62 +288%	16−18 −288%
Forza Horizon 4	279 +272%	75−80 −272%
Hitman 3	61 +281%	16−18 −281%
Horizon Zero Dawn	395 +259%	110−120 −259%
Metro Exodus	123 +310%	30−33 −310%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +254%	35−40 −254%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100 +270%	27−30 −270%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	323 +259%	90−95 −259%
Watch Dogs: Legion	170 +278%	45−50 −278%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	98 +263%	27−30 −263%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	137 +291%	35−40 −291%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	140−150 +260%	40−45 −260%
Cyberpunk 2077	130−140 +286%	35−40 −286%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +263%	30−33 −263%
Forza Horizon 4	248 +254%	70−75 −254%
Horizon Zero Dawn	283 +277%	75−80 −277%
Metro Exodus	118 +293%	30−33 −293%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	164 +264%	45−50 −264%
Watch Dogs: Legion	121 +303%	30−33 −303%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

120−130

+254%

35−40
−254%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	160−170 +269%	45−50 −269%
Far Cry New Dawn	140−150 +260%	40−45 −260%
Hitman 3	121 +303%	30−33 −303%
Red Dead Redemption 2	82 +290%	21−24 −290%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	99 +267%	27−30 −267%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	109 +263%	30−33 −263%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−110 +293%	27−30 −293%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 +311%	18−20 −311%
Far Cry 5	130−140 +280%	35−40 −280%
Forza Horizon 4	231 +255%	65−70 −255%
Horizon Zero Dawn	224 +273%	60−65 −273%
Metro Exodus	117 +290%	30−33 −290%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	190−200 +258%	55−60 −258%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130 +260%	35−40 −260%
Watch Dogs: Legion	91 +279%	24−27 −279%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	85−90 +254%	24−27 −254%
Far Cry New Dawn	110−120 +267%	30−33 −267%
Hitman 3	83 +295%	21−24 −295%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−110 +257%	30−33 −257%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85 +254%	24−27 −254%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	122 +307%	30−33 −307%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	68 +278%	18−20 −278%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	66 +267%	18−20 −267%
Battlefield 5	134 +283%	35−40 −283%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80 +262%	21−24 −262%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +289%	9−10 −289%
Forza Horizon 4	162 +260%	45−50 −260%
Horizon Zero Dawn	137 +291%	35−40 −291%
Metro Exodus	101 +274%	27−30 −274%
Watch Dogs: Legion	54 +286%	14−16 −286%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

75−80
+257%

21−24

−257%

This is how RX 6900 XT and T1000 8 GB compete in popular games:

RX 6900 XT is 267% faster in 1080p
RX 6900 XT is 269% faster in 1440p
RX 6900 XT is 271% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	69.49	19.64
Recency	8 December 2020	6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	50 Watt