Riva 128 PCI vs Radeon RX 6900 XT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking22not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation29.85no data
Power efficiency16.01no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)no data
GPU code nameNavi 21NV3
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date28 October 2020 (4 years ago)1 April 1997 (27 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5120no data
Core clock speed1825 MHz100 MHz
Boost clock speed2250 MHzno data
Number of transistors26,800 million4 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt4 Watt
Texture fill rate720.00.1
Floating-point processing power23.04 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1281
TMUs3201
Ray Tracing Cores80no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCI
Length267 mmno data
Width3-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6SDR
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz100 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s1.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C1x VGA, 1x DB13W3
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)5.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.0
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 October 2020 1 April 1997
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 350 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 4 Watt

RX 6900 XT has an age advantage of 23 years, a 409500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 4900% more advanced lithography process.

Riva 128 PCI, on the other hand, has 7400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6900 XT and Riva 128 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
Radeon RX 6900 XT
NVIDIA Riva 128 PCI
Riva 128 PCI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3669 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 10 votes

Rate Riva 128 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.