RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Radeon RX 6850M XT

Place in the ranking	77	76
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	84.74
Power efficiency	18.89	44.70
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 22	AD107
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	4 January 2022 (3 years ago)	12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	2816
Core clock speed	2321 MHz	1620 MHz
Boost clock speed	2581 MHz	2130 MHz
Number of transistors	17,200 million	18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	165 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	413.0	187.4
Floating-point processing power	13.21 TFLOPS	12 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	48
TMUs	160	88
Tensor Cores	no data	88
Ray Tracing Cores	40	22

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	168 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	384.0 GB/s	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6850M XT 45.17

RTX 2000 Ada Generation 45.35
+0.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6850M XT 17369

RTX 2000 Ada Generation 17435
+0.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	139 +6.9%	130−140 −6.9%
1440p	87 +2.4%	85−90 −2.4%
4K	67 +3.1%	65−70 −3.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	4.99
1440p	no data	7.64
4K	no data	9.98

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	95−100 +3.2%	95−100 −3.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	160 +0%	160−170 +0%
Elden Ring	89 +4.7%	85−90 −4.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0.9%	110−120 −0.9%
Counter-Strike 2	95−100 +3.2%	95−100 −3.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	68 +4.6%	65−70 −4.6%
Forza Horizon 4	297 +2.4%	290−300 −2.4%
Metro Exodus	100−110 +4%	100−105 −4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	85−90 +1.2%	85−90 −1.2%
Valorant	180−190 +2.2%	180−190 −2.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0.9%	110−120 −0.9%
Counter-Strike 2	95−100 +3.2%	95−100 −3.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	53 +6%	50−55 −6%
Dota 2	122 +1.7%	120−130 −1.7%
Elden Ring	160−170 +1.3%	160−170 −1.3%
Far Cry 5	44 +10%	40−45 −10%
Fortnite	180−190 +5%	180−190 −5%
Forza Horizon 4	259 −0.4%	260−270 +0.4%
Grand Theft Auto V	126 +5%	120−130 −5%
Metro Exodus	43 +7.5%	40−45 −7.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	85−90 +1.2%	85−90 −1.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	160−170 +3.1%	160−170 −3.1%
Valorant	180−190 +2.2%	180−190 −2.2%
World of Tanks	270−280 −0.4%	280−290 +0.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0.9%	110−120 −0.9%
Counter-Strike 2	95−100 +3.2%	95−100 −3.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	44 +10%	40−45 −10%
Dota 2	95 +0%	95−100 +0%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +3%	100−105 −3%
Forza Horizon 4	227 +3.2%	220−230 −3.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Valorant	180−190 +2.2%	180−190 −2.2%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	89 +4.7%	85−90 −4.7%
Elden Ring	95−100 +2.1%	95−100 −2.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	89 +4.7%	85−90 −4.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +2.9%	170−180 −2.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 +4.4%	45−50 −4.4%
World of Tanks	280−290 +2.1%	280−290 −2.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 +5.3%	75−80 −5.3%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +8.9%	45−50 −8.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	28 +3.7%	27−30 −3.7%
Far Cry 5	140−150 +3.6%	140−150 −3.6%
Forza Horizon 4	166 +3.8%	160−170 −3.8%
Metro Exodus	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	80−85 +3.8%	80−85 −3.8%
Valorant	150−160 +0.7%	150−160 −0.7%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +8.9%	45−50 −8.9%
Dota 2	99 +4.2%	95−100 −4.2%
Elden Ring	45−50 +4.4%	45−50 −4.4%
Grand Theft Auto V	99 +4.2%	95−100 −4.2%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +11.4%	35−40 −11.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	99 +4.2%	95−100 −4.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 +8%	50−55 −8%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +8.9%	45−50 −8.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	13 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
Dota 2	78 +4%	75−80 −4%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +1.4%	70−75 −1.4%
Fortnite	65−70 +4.6%	65−70 −4.6%
Forza Horizon 4	92 +2.2%	90−95 −2.2%
Valorant	80−85 +2.5%	80−85 −2.5%

This is how RX 6850M XT and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

RX 6850M XT is 7% faster in 1080p
RX 6850M XT is 2% faster in 1440p
RX 6850M XT is 3% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	45.17	45.35
Recency	4 January 2022	12 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	165 Watt	70 Watt

RTX 2000 Ada Generation has a 0.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 135.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 6850M XT and RTX 2000 Ada Generation.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6850M XT is a notebook card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.