RTX A4500 vs Radeon RX 6800

Place in performance ranking	32	34
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	20.13	2.55
Architecture	Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	Navi 21	GA102
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	18 November 2020 (3 years old)	23 November 2021 (2 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)	$579	no data
Current price	$781 (1.3x MSRP)	$2591

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6800 has 689% better value for money than RTX A4500.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3840	7168
Core clock speed	1815 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2105 MHz	1650 MHz
Number of transistors	26,800 million	28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	200 Watt
Texture fill rate	505.2	369.6

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	20 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	320 Bit
Memory clock speed	16000 MHz	16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	512.0 GB/s	640.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	4x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	no data	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6800 57.63
+2.5%

RTX A4500 56.24

Radeon RX 6800 outperforms RTX A4500 by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 6800 22320
+2.5%

RTX A4500 21783

Radeon RX 6800 outperforms RTX A4500 by 2% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	176 +3.5%	170−180 −3.5%
1440p	104 +4%	100−110 −4%
4K	63 +5%	60−65 −5%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

135
+3.8%

130−140

−3.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	90−95 +7.1%	85−90 −7.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	205 +2.5%	200−210 −2.5%
Battlefield 5	140−150 +10%	130−140 −10%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	150−160 +2.7%	150−160 −2.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	115 +4.5%	110−120 −4.5%
Far Cry 5	197 +3.7%	190−200 −3.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	164 +2.5%	160−170 −2.5%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 +8.7%	150−160 −8.7%
Hitman 3	180−190 +6.5%	170−180 −6.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	202 +6.3%	190−200 −6.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95 +4.4%	90−95 −4.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	245 +6.5%	230−240 −6.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	115 +4.5%	110−120 −4.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	90−95 +7.1%	85−90 −7.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	172 +7.5%	160−170 −7.5%
Battlefield 5	140−150 +10%	130−140 −10%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	150−160 +2.7%	150−160 −2.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	104 +4%	100−105 −4%
Far Cry 5	186 +3.3%	180−190 −3.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	157 +4.7%	150−160 −4.7%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 +8.7%	150−160 −8.7%
Hitman 3	180−190 +6.5%	170−180 −6.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	168 +5%	160−170 −5%
Metro Exodus	147 +5%	140−150 −5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95 +4.4%	90−95 −4.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	212 +6%	200−210 −6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	269 +3.5%	260−270 −3.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	104 +4%	100−105 −4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	90−95 +7.1%	85−90 −7.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	162 +8%	150−160 −8%
Battlefield 5	140−150 +10%	130−140 −10%
Cyberpunk 2077	99 +4.2%	95−100 −4.2%
Far Cry 5	174 +8.8%	160−170 −8.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	142 +9.2%	130−140 −9.2%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 +8.7%	150−160 −8.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	152 +8.6%	140−150 −8.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	88 +3.5%	85−90 −3.5%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−110 +7.4%	95−100 −7.4%
Hitman 3	120−130 +9.1%	110−120 −9.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	129 +7.5%	120−130 −7.5%
Metro Exodus	89 +4.7%	85−90 −4.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +13.3%	45−50 −13.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	137 +5.4%	130−140 −5.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 +5%	60−65 −5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	144 +2.9%	140−150 −2.9%
Battlefield 5	110−120 +11%	100−105 −11%
Cyberpunk 2077	74 +5.7%	70−75 −5.7%
Far Cry 5	163 +8.7%	150−160 −8.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	138 +6.2%	130−140 −6.2%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +6.7%	120−130 −6.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	95−100 +3.2%	95−100 −3.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	72 +2.9%	70−75 −2.9%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	60−65 +9.1%	55−60 −9.1%
Hitman 3	65−70 +10%	60−65 −10%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35 +16.7%	30−33 −16.7%
Metro Exodus	55 +10%	50−55 −10%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +10%	30−33 −10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	73 +4.3%	70−75 −4.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	99 +4.2%	95−100 −4.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +7.5%	40−45 −7.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	99 +4.2%	95−100 −4.2%
Battlefield 5	70−75 +2.9%	70−75 −2.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	34 +13.3%	30−33 −13.3%
Far Cry 5	91 +7.1%	85−90 −7.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	99 +4.2%	95−100 −4.2%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 +8.8%	80−85 −8.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45 +12.5%	40−45 −12.5%

This is how RX 6800 and RTX A4500 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

RX 6800 is 3.5% faster than RTX A4500

1440p resolution:

RX 6800 is 4% faster than RTX A4500

4K resolution:

RX 6800 is 5% faster than RTX A4500

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	57.63	56.24
Recency	18 November 2020	23 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	20 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	200 Watt