Arctic Sound-M vs Radeon RX 6800

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking42not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation51.52no data
Power efficiency15.91no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 21Arctic Sound
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date28 October 2020 (4 years ago)2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$579 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38408192
Core clock speed1700 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed2105 MHzno data
Number of transistors26,800 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate505.2230.4
Floating-point processing power16.17 TFLOPS14.75 TFLOPS
ROPs96128
TMUs240256
Ray Tracing Cores60no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s1.23 TB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.2N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 500 Watt

RX 6800 has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6800 and Arctic Sound-M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6800 is a desktop card while Arctic Sound-M is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6800
Radeon RX 6800
Intel Arctic Sound-M
Arctic Sound-M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1829 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound-M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.