GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs Radeon RX 6800 XT

Place in the ranking	28	204
Place by popularity	not in top-100	21
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	50.65	76.38
Power efficiency	14.95	27.38
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 21	GA107
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	28 October 2020 (4 years ago)	2 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$649	$179

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 3050 6 GB has 51% better value for money than RX 6800 XT.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4608	2304
Core clock speed	1825 MHz	1042 MHz
Boost clock speed	2250 MHz	1470 MHz
Number of transistors	26,800 million	8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	648.0	105.8
Floating-point processing power	20.74 TFLOPS	6.774 TFLOPS
ROPs	128	32
TMUs	288	72
Tensor Cores	no data	72
Ray Tracing Cores	72	18

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	267 mm	242 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	96 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	512.0 GB/s	168.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	-	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6800 XT 65.03
+134%

RTX 3050 6 GB 27.79

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6800 XT 24995
+134%

RTX 3050 6 GB 10682

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	203 +139%	85−90 −139%
1440p	145 +142%	60−65 −142%
4K	100 +150%	40−45 −150%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.20 −51.8%	2.11 +51.8%
1440p	4.48 −50%	2.98 +50%
4K	6.49 −45%	4.48 +45%

RTX 3050 6 GB has 52% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RTX 3050 6 GB has 50% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RTX 3050 6 GB has 45% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	150−160 +153%	60−65 −153%
Cyberpunk 2077	140−150 +148%	60−65 −148%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +160%	45−50 −160%
Counter-Strike 2	150−160 +153%	60−65 −153%
Cyberpunk 2077	140−150 +148%	60−65 −148%
Forza Horizon 4	404 +138%	170−180 −138%
Forza Horizon 5	160−170 +137%	70−75 −137%
Metro Exodus	127 +154%	50−55 −154%
Red Dead Redemption 2	122 +144%	50−55 −144%
Valorant	401 +136%	170−180 −136%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +160%	45−50 −160%
Counter-Strike 2	150−160 +153%	60−65 −153%
Cyberpunk 2077	140−150 +148%	60−65 −148%
Dota 2	155 +138%	65−70 −138%
Far Cry 5	58 +142%	24−27 −142%
Fortnite	250−260 +154%	100−105 −154%
Forza Horizon 4	355 +137%	150−160 −137%
Forza Horizon 5	160−170 +137%	70−75 −137%
Grand Theft Auto V	150 +150%	60−65 −150%
Metro Exodus	120 +140%	50−55 −140%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +139%	90−95 −139%
Red Dead Redemption 2	129 +135%	55−60 −135%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +149%	70−75 −149%
Valorant	173 +147%	70−75 −147%
World of Tanks	270−280 +154%	110−120 −154%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +160%	45−50 −160%
Counter-Strike 2	150−160 +153%	60−65 −153%
Cyberpunk 2077	140−150 +148%	60−65 −148%
Dota 2	145 +142%	60−65 −142%
Far Cry 5	120−130 +150%	50−55 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	302 +152%	120−130 −152%
Forza Horizon 5	160−170 +137%	70−75 −137%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +139%	90−95 −139%
Valorant	356 +137%	150−160 −137%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	120 +140%	50−55 −140%
Grand Theft Auto V	120 +140%	50−55 −140%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +150%	70−75 −150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	83 +137%	35−40 −137%
World of Tanks	400−450 +146%	180−190 −146%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +149%	35−40 −149%
Counter-Strike 2	85−90 +143%	35−40 −143%
Cyberpunk 2077	80−85 +140%	35−40 −140%
Far Cry 5	160−170 +146%	65−70 −146%
Forza Horizon 4	222 +147%	90−95 −147%
Forza Horizon 5	120−130 +142%	50−55 −142%
Metro Exodus	112 +149%	45−50 −149%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	140−150 +155%	55−60 −155%
Valorant	278 +153%	110−120 −153%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	75−80 +163%	30−33 −163%
Dota 2	134 +144%	55−60 −144%
Grand Theft Auto V	134 +144%	55−60 −144%
Metro Exodus	56 +167%	21−24 −167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 +146%	85−90 −146%
Red Dead Redemption 2	53 +152%	21−24 −152%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	134 +144%	55−60 −144%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +140%	35−40 −140%
Counter-Strike 2	75−80 +163%	30−33 −163%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +150%	16−18 −150%
Dota 2	122 +144%	50−55 −144%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +163%	40−45 −163%
Fortnite	95−100 +140%	40−45 −140%
Forza Horizon 4	133 +142%	55−60 −142%
Forza Horizon 5	75−80 +150%	30−33 −150%
Valorant	153 +135%	65−70 −135%

This is how RX 6800 XT and RTX 3050 6 GB compete in popular games:

RX 6800 XT is 139% faster in 1080p
RX 6800 XT is 142% faster in 1440p
RX 6800 XT is 150% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	65.03	27.79
Recency	28 October 2020	2 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	70 Watt