GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16G vs Radeon RX 6750 XT

Place in performance ranking	39	55
Place by popularity	not in top-100	90
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	29.50	30.63
Architecture	Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)	Ada Lovelace
GPU code name	Navi 22	AD106
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	3 March 2022 (2 years ago)	18 May 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$549	no data
Current price	$559 (1x MSRP)	$500

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4060 Ti 16G has 4% better value for money than RX 6750 XT.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	4352
Core clock speed	2150 MHz	2310 MHz
Boost clock speed	2600 MHz	2535 MHz
Number of transistors	17,200 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	416.0	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	no data
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	18000 MHz	18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	432.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	no data
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12_2
Shader Model	6.5	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.1	no data
Vulkan	1.3	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6750 XT 53.61
+8.4%

RTX 4060 Ti 16G 49.46

Radeon RX 6750 XT outperforms GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16G by 8% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 6750 XT 104004

RTX 4060 Ti 16G 116054
+11.6%

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16G outperforms Radeon RX 6750 XT by 12% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 6750 XT 48327
+12.1%

RTX 4060 Ti 16G 43112

Radeon RX 6750 XT outperforms GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16G by 12% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 6750 XT 37609
+16.5%

RTX 4060 Ti 16G 32275

Radeon RX 6750 XT outperforms GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16G by 17% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 6750 XT 170993
+3.5%

RTX 4060 Ti 16G 165263

Radeon RX 6750 XT outperforms GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16G by 3% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

RX 6750 XT 529598

RTX 4060 Ti 16G 600933
+13.5%

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16G outperforms Radeon RX 6750 XT by 13% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	166 −3%	171 +3%
1440p	93 +1.1%	92 −1.1%
4K	53 −1.9%	54 +1.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

165

−6.7%

176
+6.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 +6.1%	80−85 −6.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	90−95 +8.1%	85−90 −8.1%
Battlefield 5	130−140 +5.3%	130−140 −5.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	140−150 +7.4%	130−140 −7.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	127 −7.9%	137 +7.9%
Far Cry 5	178 −7.3%	191 +7.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	150 −6.7%	160 +6.7%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 +6.9%	140−150 −6.9%
Hitman 3	170−180 +8.2%	150−160 −8.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +9.3%	100−110 −9.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	85−90 +8.8%	80−85 −8.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	211 −6.2%	224 +6.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	135 +51.7%	85−90 −51.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 +6.1%	80−85 −6.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	90−95 +8.1%	85−90 −8.1%
Battlefield 5	130−140 +5.3%	130−140 −5.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	140−150 +7.4%	130−140 −7.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	109 −5.5%	115 +5.5%
Far Cry 5	170 −7.1%	182 +7.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	145 −6.2%	154 +6.2%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 +6.9%	140−150 −6.9%
Hitman 3	170−180 +8.2%	150−160 −8.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +9.3%	100−110 −9.3%
Metro Exodus	127 −2.4%	130 +2.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	85−90 +8.8%	80−85 −8.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	185 −4.3%	193 +4.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	245 −10.2%	270 +10.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	125 +40.4%	85−90 −40.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 +6.1%	80−85 −6.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	90−95 +8.1%	85−90 −8.1%
Battlefield 5	130−140 +5.3%	130−140 −5.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	98 −5.1%	103 +5.1%
Far Cry 5	158 −8.2%	171 +8.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	130 −5.4%	137 +5.4%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 +6.9%	140−150 −6.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	135 +2.3%	132 −2.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	98 +10.1%	85−90 −10.1%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	90−95 +9.3%	85−90 −9.3%
Hitman 3	110−120 +11.1%	95−100 −11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 +10.8%	70−75 −10.8%
Metro Exodus	76 −3.9%	79 +3.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 +9.5%	40−45 −9.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	118 −1.7%	120 +1.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +9.3%	50−55 −9.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 +10.5%	55−60 −10.5%
Battlefield 5	100−110 +7.1%	95−100 −7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	60 −3.3%	62 +3.3%
Far Cry 5	141 +11%	127 −11%
Far Cry New Dawn	126 +5.9%	119 −5.9%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +9.3%	100−110 −9.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	85−90 −9.1%	96 +9.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	73 +52.1%	45−50 −52.1%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 +12.2%	45−50 −12.2%
Hitman 3	60−65 +13.2%	50−55 −13.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +13.6%	40−45 −13.6%
Metro Exodus	47 −2.1%	48 +2.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 +11.1%	27−30 −11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60 +1.7%	59 −1.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	79 +0%	79 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +11.4%	35−40 −11.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +11.8%	30−35 −11.8%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +8.2%	60−65 −8.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	26 −3.8%	27 +3.8%
Far Cry 5	78 +20%	65 −20%
Far Cry New Dawn	82 +22.4%	67 −22.4%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +11.3%	70−75 −11.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	41 +51.9%	27−30 −51.9%

This is how RX 6750 XT and RTX 4060 Ti 16G compete in popular games:

RTX 4060 Ti 16G is 3% faster in 1080p
RX 6750 XT is 1% faster in 1440p
RTX 4060 Ti 16G is 2% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6750 XT is 52% faster than the RTX 4060 Ti 16G.
in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4060 Ti 16G is 10% faster than the RX 6750 XT.

All in all, in popular games: