Radeon RX 7600S vs RX 6700M

Place in the ranking	144	119
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	17.90	35.27
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 22	Navi 33
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	31 May 2021 (3 years ago)	4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	1792
Core clock speed	1489 MHz	1500 MHz
Boost clock speed	2400 MHz	2200 MHz
Number of transistors	17,200 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	135 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	345.6	246.4
Floating-point processing power	11.06 TFLOPS	15.77 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	144	112
Ray Tracing Cores	36	28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	10 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	160 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	320.0 GB/s	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	2.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6700M 35.18

RX 7600S 38.52
+9.5%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6700M 13548

RX 7600S 14836
+9.5%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 6700M 33497

RX 7600S 34218
+2.2%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 6700M 66973

RX 7600S 79339
+18.5%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6700M 27924
+7.8%

RX 7600S 25900

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 6700M 91672

RX 7600S 155806
+70%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX 6700M 8989

RX 7600S 9203
+2.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	121 +19.8%	101 −19.8%
1440p	40−45 −20%	48 +20%
4K	21−24 −23.8%	26 +23.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

60−65

−6.7%

60−65
+6.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 −5.3%	75−80 +5.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	98 −26.5%	124 +26.5%
Battlefield 5	110−120 −5.3%	110−120 +5.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 −5.6%	75−80 +5.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 −71.7%	103 +71.7%
Far Cry 5	75−80 −5.2%	80−85 +5.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	85−90 −5.7%	90−95 +5.7%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 −2.8%	180−190 +2.8%
Hitman 3	111 +42.3%	75−80 −42.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150 −4.7%	150−160 +4.7%
Metro Exodus	110−120 −4.3%	120−130 +4.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100 +13.6%	85−90 −13.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	120−130 −7.3%	130−140 +7.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 −2.5%	120−130 +2.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 −5.3%	75−80 +5.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	82 −24.4%	102 +24.4%
Battlefield 5	110−120 −5.3%	110−120 +5.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 −5.6%	75−80 +5.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 −40%	84 +40%
Far Cry 5	75−80 −5.2%	80−85 +5.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	85−90 −5.7%	90−95 +5.7%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 −2.8%	180−190 +2.8%
Hitman 3	96 +23.1%	75−80 −23.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150 −4.7%	150−160 +4.7%
Metro Exodus	110−120 −4.3%	120−130 +4.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	91 +3.4%	85−90 −3.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	186 −2.2%	190 +2.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	70−75 −5.6%	75−80 +5.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 −2.5%	120−130 +2.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 −5.3%	75−80 +5.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	71 −23.9%	88 +23.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 −5.6%	75−80 +5.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 −16.7%	70 +16.7%
Far Cry 5	75−80 −5.2%	80−85 +5.2%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 −2.8%	180−190 +2.8%
Hitman 3	90 +15.4%	75−80 −15.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150 −4.7%	150−160 +4.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	170 +4.3%	163 −4.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	95 +0%	95 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	64 −9.4%	70 +9.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

+0%

85−90

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 −6.1%	70−75 +6.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 −5.7%	55−60 +5.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −8.1%	40−45 +8.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −8.1%	40−45 +8.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −4.9%	40−45 +4.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −65.4%	43 +65.4%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −7.5%	40−45 +7.5%
Forza Horizon 4	190−200 −5%	200−210 +5%
Hitman 3	40−45 −6.8%	45−50 +6.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 −6.8%	75−80 +6.8%
Metro Exodus	65−70 −4.5%	65−70 +4.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 −7.3%	85−90 +7.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −8.3%	50−55 +8.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	170−180 −3.9%	180−190 +3.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

60−65

−5%

60−65
+5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −5.7%	35−40 +5.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −6.9%	30−35 +6.9%
Hitman 3	27−30 −7.1%	30−33 +7.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 −4.2%	170−180 +4.2%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −7%	45−50 +7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 −7.3%	40−45 +7.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −8.7%	24−27 +8.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −9.5%	21−24 +9.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −4.5%	21−24 +4.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −63.6%	18 +63.6%
Far Cry 5	20−22 −5%	21−24 +5%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −6.3%	50−55 +6.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −8.7%	50−55 +8.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −5.9%	18−20 +5.9%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35

−3.2%

30−35
+3.2%

This is how RX 6700M and RX 7600S compete in popular games:

RX 6700M is 20% faster in 1080p
RX 7600S is 20% faster in 1440p
RX 7600S is 24% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Hitman 3, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 6700M is 42% faster.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 7600S is 72% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 6700M is ahead in 6 tests (8%)
RX 7600S is ahead in 64 tests (89%)
there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	35.18	38.52
Recency	31 May 2021	4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	10 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	135 Watt	75 Watt

RX 6700M has a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 7600S, on the other hand, has a 9.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 6700M and Radeon RX 7600S.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.