RTX A3000 Mobile vs Radeon RX 6700M

Place in the ranking	143	171
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	18.09	32.03
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 22	GA104
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	31 May 2021 (3 years ago)	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	4096
Core clock speed	1489 MHz	600 MHz
Boost clock speed	2400 MHz	1230 MHz
Number of transistors	17,200 million	17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	135 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	345.6	157.4
Floating-point processing power	11.06 TFLOPS	10.08 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	144	128
Tensor Cores	no data	128
Ray Tracing Cores	36	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	10 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	160 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth	320.0 GB/s	264.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	-	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6700M 35.39
+8.9%

RTX A3000 Mobile 32.50

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6700M 13609
+8.9%

RTX A3000 Mobile 12496

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 6700M 33497
+28.9%

RTX A3000 Mobile 25990

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 6700M 66973

RTX A3000 Mobile 71308
+6.5%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6700M 27924
+41.7%

RTX A3000 Mobile 19710

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 6700M 91672
+206%

RTX A3000 Mobile 29996

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX 6700M 8989
+22.8%

RTX A3000 Mobile 7320

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	121 +21%	100 −21%
1440p	55−60 +1.9%	54 −1.9%
4K	50−55 +6.4%	47 −6.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	70−75 +12.5%	60−65 −12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 −2.7%	77 +2.7%
Elden Ring	120−130 +9.9%	110−120 −9.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 +5.4%	90−95 −5.4%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 +12.5%	60−65 −12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	43 −55.8%	67 +55.8%
Forza Horizon 4	202 +23.2%	164 −23.2%
Metro Exodus	85−90 −18.4%	103 +18.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100 +49.3%	65−70 −49.3%
Valorant	200 +53.8%	130−140 −53.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 +5.4%	90−95 −5.4%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 +12.5%	60−65 −12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	34 −61.8%	55 +61.8%
Dota 2	119 −9.2%	130 +9.2%
Elden Ring	120−130 +9.9%	110−120 −9.9%
Far Cry 5	90−95 +8.2%	85 −8.2%
Fortnite	160−170 +6%	150−160 −6%
Forza Horizon 4	186 +38.8%	134 −38.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	117 −6%	124 +6%
Metro Exodus	85−90 +77.6%	49 −77.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	190−200 +4.3%	180−190 −4.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	70−75 +6%	65−70 −6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130 +10.8%	110−120 −10.8%
Valorant	100 −30%	130−140 +30%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0.7%	270−280 −0.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 +5.4%	90−95 −5.4%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 +12.5%	60−65 −12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	28 −64.3%	46 +64.3%
Dota 2	112 −17.9%	132 +17.9%
Far Cry 5	90−95 +3.4%	85−90 −3.4%
Forza Horizon 4	170 +49.1%	114 −49.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	190−200 +4.3%	180−190 −4.3%
Valorant	175 +34.6%	130−140 −34.6%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	60−65 +3.2%	62 −3.2%
Elden Ring	70−75 +12.9%	60−65 −12.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	60−65 +3.2%	62 −3.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +9.7%	30−35 −9.7%
World of Tanks	220−230 +8.1%	200−210 −8.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +6.3%	60−65 −6.3%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +13.3%	30−33 −13.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +21.4%	28 −21.4%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +10.8%	100−110 −10.8%
Forza Horizon 4	100−105 +16.3%	86 −16.3%
Metro Exodus	75−80 +6.8%	70−75 −6.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 +13.5%	50−55 −13.5%
Valorant	100−110 +12.6%	95−100 −12.6%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +12.5%	30−35 −12.5%
Dota 2	65−70 +36.7%	49 −36.7%
Elden Ring	30−35 +13.8%	27−30 −13.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	65−70 +36.7%	49 −36.7%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +11.5%	24−27 −11.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 +10.8%	100−110 −10.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +9.5%	21−24 −9.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65−70 +36.7%	49 −36.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +11.1%	35−40 −11.1%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +12.5%	30−35 −12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +114%	7 −114%
Dota 2	65−70 −14.9%	77 +14.9%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +13.3%	45−50 −13.3%
Fortnite	45−50 +11.6%	40−45 −11.6%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +11.8%	51 −11.8%
Valorant	55−60 +14.6%	45−50 −14.6%

This is how RX 6700M and RTX A3000 Mobile compete in popular games:

RX 6700M is 21% faster in 1080p
RX 6700M is 2% faster in 1440p
RX 6700M is 6% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6700M is 114% faster.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX A3000 Mobile is 64% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 6700M is ahead in 52 tests (83%)
RTX A3000 Mobile is ahead in 10 tests (16%)
there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	35.39	32.50
Recency	31 May 2021	12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount	10 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	135 Watt	70 Watt

RX 6700M has a 8.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, a 66.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

RTX A3000 Mobile, on the other hand, has 92.9% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 6700M and RTX A3000 Mobile.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6700M is a notebook graphics card while RTX A3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.