GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon RX 6700M

Place in the ranking	146	36
Place by popularity	not in top-100	16
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	83.11
Power efficiency	17.90	25.50
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 22	AD106
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	31 May 2021 (3 years ago)	18 May 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	4352
Core clock speed	1489 MHz	2310 MHz
Boost clock speed	2400 MHz	2535 MHz
Number of transistors	17,200 million	22,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	135 Watt	160 Watt
Texture fill rate	345.6	344.8
Floating-point processing power	11.06 TFLOPS	22.06 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	48
TMUs	144	136
Tensor Cores	no data	136
Ray Tracing Cores	36	34

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	240 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	10 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	160 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	320.0 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6700M 33.77

RTX 4060 Ti 57.02
+68.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6700M 13497

RTX 4060 Ti 22787
+68.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

121

−65.3%

200−210
+65.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

2.00

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	70−75 −54.9%	110−120 +54.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 −62.2%	120−130 +62.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 −63.3%	160−170 +63.3%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 −54.9%	110−120 +54.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	43 −62.8%	70−75 +62.8%
Forza Horizon 4	202 −48.5%	300−310 +48.5%
Forza Horizon 5	90−95 −64.8%	150−160 +64.8%
Metro Exodus	85−90 −62.8%	140−150 +62.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100 −60%	160−170 +60%
Valorant	200 −50%	300−310 +50%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 −63.3%	160−170 +63.3%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 −54.9%	110−120 +54.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	34 −61.8%	55−60 +61.8%
Dota 2	119 −68.1%	200−210 +68.1%
Far Cry 5	90−95 −63%	150−160 +63%
Fortnite	150−160 −63.5%	260−270 +63.5%
Forza Horizon 4	186 −61.3%	300−310 +61.3%
Forza Horizon 5	90−95 −64.8%	150−160 +64.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	117 −62.4%	190−200 +62.4%
Metro Exodus	85−90 −62.8%	140−150 +62.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	190−200 −57.1%	300−310 +57.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	70−75 −54.9%	110−120 +54.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130 −63.9%	200−210 +63.9%
Valorant	100 −60%	160−170 +60%
World of Tanks	270−280 −61.9%	450−500 +61.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 −63.3%	160−170 +63.3%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 −54.9%	110−120 +54.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	28 −60.7%	45−50 +60.7%
Dota 2	112 −60.7%	180−190 +60.7%
Far Cry 5	90−95 −63%	150−160 +63%
Forza Horizon 4	170 −64.7%	280−290 +64.7%
Forza Horizon 5	90−95 −64.8%	150−160 +64.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	190−200 −57.1%	300−310 +57.1%
Valorant	175 −65.7%	290−300 +65.7%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	27−30 −55.2%	45−50 +55.2%
Dota 2	60−65 −56.3%	100−105 +56.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	60−65 −56.3%	100−105 +56.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −65.7%	290−300 +65.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −61.8%	55−60 +61.8%
World of Tanks	220−230 −56.3%	350−400 +56.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 −64.2%	110−120 +64.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −61.8%	55−60 +61.8%
Far Cry 5	110−120 −60.7%	180−190 +60.7%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 −61.6%	160−170 +61.6%
Forza Horizon 5	55−60 −63.8%	95−100 +63.8%
Metro Exodus	75−80 −66.7%	130−140 +66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 −63.8%	95−100 +63.8%
Valorant	100−110 −61.9%	170−180 +61.9%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −52.2%	35−40 +52.2%
Dota 2	65−70 −64.2%	110−120 +64.2%
Grand Theft Auto V	65−70 −64.2%	110−120 +64.2%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −55.2%	45−50 +55.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 −60.7%	180−190 +60.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −59.1%	35−40 +59.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65−70 −64.2%	110−120 +64.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −62.5%	65−70 +62.5%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −52.2%	35−40 +52.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −50%	21−24 +50%
Dota 2	65−70 −64.2%	110−120 +64.2%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −60%	80−85 +60%
Fortnite	45−50 −66.7%	80−85 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −66.7%	95−100 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35 −56.3%	50−55 +56.3%
Valorant	50−55 −66.7%	90−95 +66.7%

This is how RX 6700M and RTX 4060 Ti compete in popular games:

RTX 4060 Ti is 65% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	33.77	57.02
Recency	31 May 2021	18 May 2023
Maximum RAM amount	10 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	135 Watt	160 Watt

RX 6700M has a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 18.5% lower power consumption.

RTX 4060 Ti, on the other hand, has a 68.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6700M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6700M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.