Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS vs Radeon RX 6700
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX 6700 with Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, including specs and performance data.
RX 6700 outperforms Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS by a whopping 353% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 58 | 423 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 19.92 | 25.63 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024) | no data |
| GPU code name | Navi 22 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 9 June 2021 (3 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2304 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 1941 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2450 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 17,200 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 175 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 352.8 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 11.29 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 64 | no data |
| TMUs | 144 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | no data |
| Length | 267 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | LPDDR5x |
| Maximum RAM amount | 10 GB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 160 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 8448 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 320.0 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C | no data |
| HDMI | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 150−160
+341%
| 34
−341%
|
| 1440p | 75−80
+341%
| 17
−341%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 50.10 | 11.05 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 175 Watt | 30 Watt |
RX 6700 has a 353.4% higher aggregate performance score.
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, on the other hand, has a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 483.3% lower power consumption.
The Radeon RX 6700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon RX 6700 is a desktop card while Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
