Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS vs Radeon RX 6700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX 6700 Radeon RX 6700 XT Radeon RX 6750 GRE Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB Radeon RX 6750 XT
VS
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6700 with Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, including specs and performance data.

RX 6700
2021
10 GB GDDR6, 175 Watt
46.73
+371%

RX 6700 outperforms Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS by a whopping 371% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RX 6700 RX 6700
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking65436
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency19.6824.37
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)no data
GPU code nameNavi 22no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date9 June 2021 (3 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041536
Core clock speed1941 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2450 MHz1250 MHz
Number of transistors17,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate352.8no data
Floating-point processing power11.29 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs144no data
Ray Tracing Cores36no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount10 GBno data
Memory bus width160 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2000 MHz8448 MHz
Memory bandwidth320.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-Cno data
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.3-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD160−170
+357%
35
−357%
1440p80−85
+344%
18
−344%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 23
+0%
23
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 19
+0%
19
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50
+0%
50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16
+0%
16
+0%
Dota 2 35
+0%
35
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 42
+0%
42
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35
+0%
35
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
World of Tanks 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14
+0%
14
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 36
+0%
36
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 15
+0%
15
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+0%
15
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
World of Tanks 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 28
+0%
28
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

This is how RX 6700 and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS compete in popular games:

  • RX 6700 is 357% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6700 is 344% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 54 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 46.73 9.92
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 30 Watt

RX 6700 has a 371.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, on the other hand, has a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 483.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6700 is a desktop card while Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX 6700
Radeon RX 6700
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX 6700 Radeon RX 6700
vs
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
vs
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
RX 6700 Radeon RX 6700
vs
RTX 2080 Super GeForce RTX 2080 Super
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
vs
RTX 4060 Ti GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
vs
RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
vs
UHD Graphics 770 Mobile UHD Graphics 770 Mobile
RTX 3060 Ti GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
vs
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
RX 6900 Radeon RX 6900
vs
Pro W6400 Radeon Pro W6400
Marvel G400 TV
vs
RTX 5070 Ti GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
Mystique G200
vs
Riva TNT2 Riva TNT2
Iris Xe MAX Graphics Iris Xe MAX Graphics
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile Iris Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile
Iris Xe Graphics MAX Iris Xe Graphics MAX
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile Iris Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile
RTX 3080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q
vs
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.3 1402 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 11 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.