GeForce RTX 4080 vs Radeon RX 6700 XT

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6700 XT and GeForce RTX 4080, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 6700 XT
2021
12 GB GDDR6, 230 Watt
51.51

RTX 4080 outperforms RX 6700 XT by an impressive 74% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking503
Place by popularity81not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation57.8728.95
Power efficiency15.5719.50
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 22AD103
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date3 March 2021 (3 years ago)20 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$479 $1,199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6700 XT has 100% better value for money than RTX 4080.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25609728
Core clock speed2321 MHz2205 MHz
Boost clock speed2581 MHz2505 MHz
Number of transistors17,200 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt320 Watt
Texture fill rate413.0761.5
Floating-point processing power13.21 TFLOPS48.74 TFLOPS
ROPs64112
TMUs160304
Tensor Coresno data304
Ray Tracing Cores4076

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm310 mm
Width2-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount12 GB16 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s716.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6700 XT 51.51
RTX 4080 89.75
+74.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6700 XT 19875
RTX 4080 34627
+74.2%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 6700 XT 45676
RTX 4080 86267
+88.9%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 6700 XT 109039
RTX 4080 143194
+31.3%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6700 XT 35504
RTX 4080 57903
+63.1%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 6700 XT 176617
RTX 4080 185431
+5%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 6700 XT 579310
RTX 4080 769721
+32.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD159
−52.2%
242
+52.2%
1440p87
−88.5%
164
+88.5%
4K51
−118%
111
+118%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.014.95
1440p5.517.31
4K9.3910.80

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 119
−94.1%
231
+94.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−110
−69.4%
180−190
+69.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 169
−55%
262
+55%
Battlefield 5 160−170
−48.8%
240−250
+48.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−105
−20%
120−130
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 99
−133%
231
+133%
Far Cry 5 100−110
−14.6%
110−120
+14.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
−60.8%
200−210
+60.8%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
−24.2%
260−270
+24.2%
Hitman 3 138
+7%
120−130
−7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 200−210
−57.2%
300−350
+57.2%
Metro Exodus 140−150
−5.4%
150−160
+5.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
−14.8%
120−130
+14.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 200−210
−101%
400−450
+101%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
−7.7%
150−160
+7.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−110
−69.4%
180−190
+69.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 144
−50.7%
217
+50.7%
Battlefield 5 160−170
−48.8%
240−250
+48.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−105
−20%
120−130
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 90
−133%
210
+133%
Far Cry 5 100−110
−14.6%
110−120
+14.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
−60.8%
200−210
+60.8%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
−24.2%
260−270
+24.2%
Hitman 3 136
+5.4%
120−130
−5.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 200−210
−57.2%
300−350
+57.2%
Metro Exodus 140−150
−5.4%
150−160
+5.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
−14.8%
120−130
+14.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 281
−82.2%
512
+82.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
−92.5%
200−210
+92.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
−7.7%
150−160
+7.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−110
−69.4%
180−190
+69.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 125
−51.2%
189
+51.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−105
−20%
120−130
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 85
−124%
190
+124%
Far Cry 5 100−110
−14.6%
110−120
+14.6%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
−24.2%
260−270
+24.2%
Hitman 3 135
+4.7%
120−130
−4.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 193
−105%
396
+105%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 240
−100%
480
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 127
−104%
259
+104%
Watch Dogs: Legion 84
−95.2%
164
+95.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
−14.8%
120−130
+14.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
−56.6%
160−170
+56.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
−40%
110−120
+40%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
−91.4%
110−120
+91.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 109
−40.4%
153
+40.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
−34.4%
80−85
+34.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 56
−130%
129
+130%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−40%
80−85
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 260−270
−3.8%
270−280
+3.8%
Hitman 3 83
−57.8%
130−140
+57.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 145
−129%
332
+129%
Metro Exodus 123
−21.1%
149
+21.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 173
−125%
390
+125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
−130%
191
+130%
Watch Dogs: Legion 220−230
−9.1%
240−250
+9.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
−44.9%
120−130
+44.9%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−60%
85−90
+60%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−46.8%
65−70
+46.8%
Hitman 3 48
−72.9%
80−85
+72.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
−7.6%
220−230
+7.6%
Metro Exodus 70−75
−97.2%
140−150
+97.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
−153%
187
+153%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−113%
80−85
+113%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 48
−108%
100
+108%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−48.6%
50−55
+48.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
−152%
63
+152%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−51.5%
50−55
+51.5%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−162%
190−200
+162%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 93
−110%
195
+110%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35
−149%
87
+149%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−127%
110−120
+127%

This is how RX 6700 XT and RTX 4080 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4080 is 52% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4080 is 89% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4080 is 118% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Hitman 3, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 6700 XT is 7% faster.
  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4080 is 162% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6700 XT is ahead in 3 tests (4%)
  • RTX 4080 is ahead in 69 tests (96%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 51.51 89.75
Recency 3 March 2021 20 September 2022
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 320 Watt

RX 6700 XT has 39.1% lower power consumption.

RTX 4080, on the other hand, has a 74.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4080 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6700 XT in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
Radeon RX 6700 XT
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
GeForce RTX 4080

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 6576 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4296 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.