RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon RX 6650M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

RX 6650M
2022
8 GB GDDR6
38.23
+4.8%

Radeon RX 6650M outperforms RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile by 5% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking113124
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 2 (2020−2022)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameNavi 23no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17923072
Boost clock speed2222 MHzno data
Number of transistors11,060 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate270.6no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 6650M and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed18000 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.2no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6650M 38.23
+4.8%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 36.48

Radeon RX 6650M outperforms RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile by 5% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 6650M 32846
+8.5%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 30262

Radeon RX 6650M outperforms RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile by 9% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 6650M 25739
+16.8%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 22039

Radeon RX 6650M outperforms RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile by 17% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD116
+5.5%
110−120
−5.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 127
+5.8%
120−130
−5.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+13.3%
60−65
−13.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+11.7%
60−65
−11.7%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+12%
100−105
−12%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+9.5%
95−100
−9.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 106
+6%
100−105
−6%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+7.8%
90−95
−7.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
+8.2%
85−90
−8.2%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+6.4%
110−120
−6.4%
Hitman 3 179
+5.3%
170−180
−5.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+10.7%
75−80
−10.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+10.9%
55−60
−10.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90−95
+8.2%
85−90
−8.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 104
+9.5%
95−100
−9.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+13.3%
60−65
−13.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+11.7%
60−65
−11.7%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+12%
100−105
−12%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+9.5%
95−100
−9.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+5.3%
75−80
−5.3%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+7.8%
90−95
−7.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
+8.2%
85−90
−8.2%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+6.4%
110−120
−6.4%
Hitman 3 161
+7.3%
150−160
−7.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+10.7%
75−80
−10.7%
Metro Exodus 86
+7.5%
80−85
−7.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+10.9%
55−60
−10.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90−95
+8.2%
85−90
−8.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 167
+11.3%
150−160
−11.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 94
+10.6%
85−90
−10.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+13.3%
60−65
−13.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+11.7%
60−65
−11.7%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+12%
100−105
−12%
Cyberpunk 2077 64
+6.7%
60−65
−6.7%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+7.8%
90−95
−7.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
+8.2%
85−90
−8.2%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+6.4%
110−120
−6.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90
+5.9%
85−90
−5.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 62
+12.7%
55−60
−12.7%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+5%
60−65
−5%
Hitman 3 70−75
+9.2%
65−70
−9.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+6%
50−55
−6%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+5%
40−45
−5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+14%
50−55
−14%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+5%
40−45
−5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+5%
40−45
−5%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+8%
75−80
−8%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+7.7%
65−70
−7.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 70−75
+10.8%
65−70
−10.8%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+8%
75−80
−8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+8%
50−55
−8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Hitman 3 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+15%
40−45
−15%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+17.5%
40−45
−17.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+6%
50−55
−6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%

This is how RX 6650M and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RX 6650M is 5.5% faster than RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.23 36.48
Recency 4 January 2022 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 115 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 6650M and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6650M
Radeon RX 6650M
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 69 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 9 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.