GeForce MX570 A vs Radeon RX 6650M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6650M with GeForce MX570 A, including specs and performance data.

RX 6650M
2022
8 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
38.67
+151%

RX 6650M outperforms MX570 A by a whopping 151% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking107323
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 2 (2020−2022)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 23GA107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years ago)May 2022 (2 years ago)
Current priceno data$1574

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17922048
Boost clock speed2222 MHz1155 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate270.673.92

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 6650M and GeForce MX570 A compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed18000 MHz12 GB/s
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDAno data8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6650M 38.67
+151%
MX570 A 15.43

Radeon RX 6650M outperforms GeForce MX570 A by 151% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 6650M 14934
+151%
MX570 A 5957

Radeon RX 6650M outperforms GeForce MX570 A by 151% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD114
+153%
45−50
−153%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 300−310
+136%
127
−136%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 170−180
+150%
65−70
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 160−170
+139%
65−70
−139%
Battlefield 5 300−310
+140%
120−130
−140%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 190−200
+144%
75−80
−144%
Cyberpunk 2077 260−270
+145%
106
−145%
Far Cry 5 210−220
+150%
80−85
−150%
Far Cry New Dawn 240−250
+150%
95−100
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 350−400
+136%
140−150
−136%
Hitman 3 200−210
+150%
80−85
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 350−400
+124%
150−160
−124%
Metro Exodus 270−280
+143%
110−120
−143%
Red Dead Redemption 2 230−240
+147%
90−95
−147%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 550−600
+148%
222
−148%
Watch Dogs: Legion 260−270
+150%
104
−150%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 170−180
+150%
65−70
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 160−170
+139%
65−70
−139%
Battlefield 5 300−310
+140%
120−130
−140%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 190−200
+144%
75−80
−144%
Cyberpunk 2077 190−200
+141%
79
−141%
Far Cry 5 210−220
+150%
80−85
−150%
Far Cry New Dawn 240−250
+150%
95−100
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 350−400
+136%
140−150
−136%
Hitman 3 200−210
+150%
80−85
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 350−400
+124%
150−160
−124%
Metro Exodus 270−280
+143%
110−120
−143%
Red Dead Redemption 2 230−240
+147%
90−95
−147%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 450−500
+137%
190
−137%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 400−450
+140%
167
−140%
Watch Dogs: Legion 240−250
+150%
95−100
−150%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 170−180
+150%
65−70
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 160−170
+139%
65−70
−139%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 190−200
+144%
75−80
−144%
Cyberpunk 2077 160−170
+150%
64
−150%
Far Cry 5 210−220
+150%
80−85
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 350−400
+136%
140−150
−136%
Horizon Zero Dawn 350−400
+124%
150−160
−124%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 400−450
+140%
167
−140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 220−230
+144%
90
−144%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+142%
62
−142%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 230−240
+147%
90−95
−147%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 180−190
+143%
70−75
−143%
Far Cry New Dawn 220−230
+144%
90−95
−144%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−105
+138%
40−45
−138%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−105
+133%
40−45
−133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 140−150
+137%
55−60
−137%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+150%
30−33
−150%
Far Cry 5 170−180
+143%
70−75
−143%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+147%
80−85
−147%
Hitman 3 120−130
+140%
50−55
−140%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+150%
80−85
−150%
Metro Exodus 180−190
+150%
70−75
−150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 230−240
+145%
90−95
−145%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
+150%
55−60
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+150%
30−35
−150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 160−170
+142%
65−70
−142%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+144%
35−40
−144%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+150%
30−35
−150%
Hitman 3 75−80
+142%
30−35
−142%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+145%
45−50
−145%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
+150%
30−33
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+139%
45−50
−139%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+150%
24−27
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+150%
24−27
−150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+140%
24−27
−140%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+131%
12−14
−131%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+139%
21−24
−139%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+141%
50−55
−141%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+145%
45−50
−145%
Metro Exodus 100−105
+150%
40−45
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+137%
18−20
−137%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+150%
30−35
−150%

This is how RX 6650M and MX570 A compete in popular games:

  • RX 6650M is 153% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.67 15.43
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 25 Watt

The Radeon RX 6650M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX570 A in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6650M is a notebook card while GeForce MX570 A is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6650M
Radeon RX 6650M
NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A
GeForce MX570 A

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 72 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 12 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.