UHD Graphics 64EU vs Radeon RX 6650M XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking82not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency25.48no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 23Alder Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048512
Core clock speed2068 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2416 MHz1400 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate309.244.80
Floating-point processing power9.896 TFLOPS1.434 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs12832
Ray Tracing Cores32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8Ring Bus
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 45 Watt

RX 6650M XT has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

UHD Graphics 64EU, on the other hand, has 166.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6650M XT and UHD Graphics 64EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6650M XT is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 64EU is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT
Radeon RX 6650M XT
Intel UHD Graphics 64EU
UHD Graphics 64EU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 59 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 105 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 64EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.