RTX A400 vs Radeon RX 6650 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6650 XT with RTX A400, including specs and performance data.

RX 6650 XT
2022
8 GB GDDR6, 176 Watt
44.57
+209%

RX 6650 XT outperforms RTX A400 by a whopping 209% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking81371
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation62.73no data
Power efficiency17.4119.81
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 23GA107
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date10 May 2022 (2 years ago)16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048768
Core clock speed2055 MHz727 MHz
Boost clock speed2635 MHz1762 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)176 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate337.342.29
Floating-point processing power10.79 TFLOPS2.706 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs12824
Tensor Coresno data24
Ray Tracing Cores326

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data163 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2190 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth280.3 GB/s96 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 6650 XT 44.57
+209%
RTX A400 14.41

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6650 XT 17172
+209%
RTX A400 5553

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD142
+216%
45−50
−216%
1440p66
+214%
21−24
−214%
4K36
+260%
10−12
−260%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.81no data
1440p6.05no data
4K11.08no data

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 212
+226%
65−70
−226%
Counter-Strike 2 137
+243%
40−45
−243%
Cyberpunk 2077 128
+220%
40−45
−220%
Atomic Heart 153
+240%
45−50
−240%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+243%
40−45
−243%
Counter-Strike 2 104
+247%
30−33
−247%
Cyberpunk 2077 108
+260%
30−33
−260%
Far Cry 5 173
+215%
55−60
−215%
Fortnite 170−180
+222%
55−60
−222%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+218%
50−55
−218%
Forza Horizon 5 133
+233%
40−45
−233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+220%
50−55
−220%
Valorant 230−240
+215%
75−80
−215%
Atomic Heart 89
+230%
27−30
−230%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+243%
40−45
−243%
Counter-Strike 2 84
+211%
27−30
−211%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+227%
85−90
−227%
Cyberpunk 2077 88
+226%
27−30
−226%
Dota 2 171
+211%
55−60
−211%
Far Cry 5 163
+226%
50−55
−226%
Fortnite 170−180
+222%
55−60
−222%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+218%
50−55
−218%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+249%
35−40
−249%
Grand Theft Auto V 147
+227%
45−50
−227%
Metro Exodus 102
+240%
30−33
−240%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+220%
50−55
−220%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 182
+231%
55−60
−231%
Valorant 230−240
+215%
75−80
−215%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+243%
40−45
−243%
Counter-Strike 2 74
+252%
21−24
−252%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+225%
24−27
−225%
Dota 2 136
+240%
40−45
−240%
Far Cry 5 151
+236%
45−50
−236%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+218%
50−55
−218%
Forza Horizon 5 107
+257%
30−33
−257%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+220%
50−55
−220%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 107
+257%
30−33
−257%
Valorant 230−240
+215%
75−80
−215%
Fortnite 170−180
+222%
55−60
−222%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+220%
10−11
−220%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 280−290
+216%
90−95
−216%
Grand Theft Auto V 77
+221%
24−27
−221%
Metro Exodus 58
+222%
18−20
−222%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+218%
55−60
−218%
Valorant 260−270
+213%
85−90
−213%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+247%
30−33
−247%
Cyberpunk 2077 44
+214%
14−16
−214%
Far Cry 5 114
+226%
35−40
−226%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+243%
35−40
−243%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+248%
21−24
−248%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+233%
24−27
−233%
Fortnite 110−120
+214%
35−40
−214%
Atomic Heart 30−35
+240%
10−11
−240%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Grand Theft Auto V 72
+243%
21−24
−243%
Metro Exodus 37
+270%
10−11
−270%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 56
+211%
18−20
−211%
Valorant 250−260
+213%
80−85
−213%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+214%
21−24
−214%
Counter-Strike 2 8
+300%
2−3
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+260%
5−6
−260%
Dota 2 97
+223%
30−33
−223%
Far Cry 5 55
+244%
16−18
−244%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+233%
24−27
−233%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+236%
14−16
−236%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+222%
18−20
−222%
Fortnite 55−60
+244%
16−18
−244%

This is how RX 6650 XT and RTX A400 compete in popular games:

  • RX 6650 XT is 216% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6650 XT is 214% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6650 XT is 260% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 44.57 14.41
Recency 10 May 2022 16 April 2024
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 176 Watt 50 Watt

RX 6650 XT has a 209.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

RTX A400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 252% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6650 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6650 XT is a desktop card while RTX A400 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
Radeon RX 6650 XT
NVIDIA RTX A400
RTX A400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4
3576 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7
19 votes

Rate RTX A400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6650 XT or RTX A400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.