RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon RX 6600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6600 with RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RX 6600
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 132 Watt
37.87

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking117113
Place by popularity14not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation65.52no data
Power efficiency20.5323.63
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 23no data
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date13 October 2021 (3 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17923072
Core clock speed1626 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2491 MHzno data
Number of transistors11,060 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)132 Watt115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate279.0no data
Floating-point processing power8.928 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs112no data
Ray Tracing Cores28no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Length190 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.2-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6600 37.87
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 37.97
+0.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6600 15133
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 15175
+0.3%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 6600 31774
+9.9%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 28910

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 6600 94734
+150%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 37844

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6600 23366
+9.3%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 21379

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 6600 145870
+26.6%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 115230

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD111
+0.9%
110−120
−0.9%
1440p56
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%
4K31
+3.3%
30−35
−3.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.96no data
1440p5.88no data
4K10.61no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 111
+0.9%
110−120
−0.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 107
+7%
100−105
−7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+4%
100−105
−4%
Counter-Strike 2 84
+5%
80−85
−5%
Cyberpunk 2077 81
+1.3%
80−85
−1.3%
Forza Horizon 4 225
+2.3%
220−230
−2.3%
Forza Horizon 5 123
+2.5%
120−130
−2.5%
Metro Exodus 140
+0%
140−150
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+2.7%
75−80
−2.7%
Valorant 150−160
+4.7%
150−160
−4.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+4%
100−105
−4%
Counter-Strike 2 68
+4.6%
65−70
−4.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 69
+6.2%
65−70
−6.2%
Dota 2 141
+0.7%
140−150
−0.7%
Far Cry 5 62
+3.3%
60−65
−3.3%
Fortnite 170−180
+1.2%
170−180
−1.2%
Forza Horizon 4 182
+1.1%
180−190
−1.1%
Forza Horizon 5 98
+3.2%
95−100
−3.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 137
+5.4%
130−140
−5.4%
Metro Exodus 98
+3.2%
95−100
−3.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0.5%
200−210
−0.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+2.7%
75−80
−2.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+4.7%
150−160
−4.7%
World of Tanks 270−280
+3.3%
270−280
−3.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+4%
100−105
−4%
Counter-Strike 2 59
+7.3%
55−60
−7.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 56
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%
Dota 2 107
+7%
100−105
−7%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+2.1%
95−100
−2.1%
Forza Horizon 4 157
+4.7%
150−160
−4.7%
Forza Horizon 5 85
+0%
85−90
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0.5%
200−210
−0.5%
Valorant 150−160
+4.7%
150−160
−4.7%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 64
+6.7%
60−65
−6.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 64
+6.7%
60−65
−6.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+2.9%
170−180
−2.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
World of Tanks 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+4.3%
70−75
−4.3%
Counter-Strike 2 33
+10%
30−33
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+5.8%
120−130
−5.8%
Forza Horizon 4 101
+1%
100−105
−1%
Forza Horizon 5 60
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 97
+2.1%
95−100
−2.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+6.2%
65−70
−6.2%
Valorant 120−130
+3.3%
120−130
−3.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Dota 2 60
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 60
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 29
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+5.8%
120−130
−5.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+2.2%
45−50
−2.2%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 85
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+5.5%
55−60
−5.5%
Fortnite 55−60
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%
Forza Horizon 4 53
+6%
50−55
−6%
Forza Horizon 5 29
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

This is how RX 6600 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600 is 1% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6600 is 2% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6600 is 3% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.87 37.97
Recency 13 October 2021 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 132 Watt 115 Watt

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 0.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 14.8% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 6600 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6600 is a desktop card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6600
Radeon RX 6600
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 10274 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 23 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.