RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon RX 6600

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

RX 6600
2021
8 GB GDDR6
39.09
+7.1%

Radeon RX 6600 outperforms RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile by a small 7% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking107125
Place by popularity12not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation34.40no data
ArchitectureNavi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameNavi 23no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date13 October 2021 (2 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 no data
Current price$358 (1.1x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17923072
Core clock speed2044 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2491 MHzno data
Number of transistors11,060 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)132 Watt115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate279.0no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 6600 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Length190 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed14500 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.2no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6600 39.09
+7.1%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 36.49

Radeon RX 6600 outperforms RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile by 7% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 6600 94734
+150%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 37844

Radeon RX 6600 outperforms RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile by 150% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 6600 31774
+5%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 30262

Radeon RX 6600 outperforms RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile by 5% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 6600 23366
+6%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 22039

Radeon RX 6600 outperforms RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile by 6% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 6600 145870
+9.5%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 133204

Radeon RX 6600 outperforms RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile by 10% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD114
+14%
100−110
−14%
1440p58
+16%
50−55
−16%
4K32
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 107
+12.6%
95−100
−12.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+15%
60−65
−15%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 113
+13%
100−105
−13%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+13%
100−105
−13%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+12.6%
95−100
−12.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 91
+13.8%
80−85
−13.8%
Far Cry 5 154
+10%
140−150
−10%
Far Cry New Dawn 140
+7.7%
130−140
−7.7%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+8.2%
110−120
−8.2%
Hitman 3 120−130
+12.7%
110−120
−12.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120
+9.1%
110−120
−9.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+14.5%
55−60
−14.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 142
+9.2%
130−140
−9.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 105
+10.5%
95−100
−10.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+15%
60−65
−15%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 92
+8.2%
85−90
−8.2%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+13%
100−105
−13%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+12.6%
95−100
−12.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 73
+12.3%
65−70
−12.3%
Far Cry 5 142
+9.2%
130−140
−9.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 133
+10.8%
120−130
−10.8%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+8.2%
110−120
−8.2%
Hitman 3 120−130
+12.7%
110−120
−12.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 93
+9.4%
85−90
−9.4%
Metro Exodus 82
+9.3%
75−80
−9.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+14.5%
55−60
−14.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 119
+8.2%
110−120
−8.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 147
+13.1%
130−140
−13.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 94
+10.6%
85−90
−10.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+15%
60−65
−15%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 78
+11.4%
70−75
−11.4%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+13%
100−105
−13%
Cyberpunk 2077 59
+7.3%
55−60
−7.3%
Far Cry 5 134
+11.7%
120−130
−11.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 118
+7.3%
110−120
−7.3%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+8.2%
110−120
−8.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90
+12.5%
80−85
−12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 58
+16%
50−55
−16%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+8.3%
60−65
−8.3%
Hitman 3 70−75
+12.3%
65−70
−12.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 64
+16.4%
55−60
−16.4%
Metro Exodus 48
+20%
40−45
−20%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 69
+15%
60−65
−15%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 52
+15.6%
45−50
−15.6%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+9.3%
75−80
−9.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Far Cry 5 91
+13.8%
80−85
−13.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 97
+7.8%
90−95
−7.8%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+9.3%
75−80
−9.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+12%
50−55
−12%
Watch Dogs: Legion 41
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Hitman 3 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Metro Exodus 29
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 33
+10%
30−33
−10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
+10%
40−45
−10%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+20%
40−45
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 44
+10%
40−45
−10%
Far Cry New Dawn 48
+20%
40−45
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+10%
50−55
−10%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%

This is how RX 6600 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600 is 14% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6600 is 16% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6600 is 19% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.09 36.49
Recency 13 October 2021 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 132 Watt 115 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 6600 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6600 is a desktop card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6600
Radeon RX 6600
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 7506 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 10 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.