GeForce RTX 4090 D vs Radeon RX 6550M

Place in the ranking	220	14
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	14.06
Power efficiency	21.66	12.09
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 24	AD102
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	4 January 2023 (2 years ago)	28 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$1,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	14592
Core clock speed	2000 MHz	2280 MHz
Boost clock speed	2840 MHz	2520 MHz
Number of transistors	5,400 million	76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	425 Watt
Texture fill rate	181.8	1,149
Floating-point processing power	5.816 TFLOPS	73.54 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	176
TMUs	64	456
Tensor Cores	no data	456
Ray Tracing Cores	16	114

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x4	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	304 mm
Width	no data	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	2250 MHz	1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth	144.0 GB/s	1,008 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6550M 24.21

RTX 4090 D 71.78
+196%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6550M 9674

RTX 4090 D 28686
+197%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	71 −196%	210−220 +196%
1440p	24 −192%	70−75 +192%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	7.61
1440p	no data	22.84

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	53 −183%	150−160 +183%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 −194%	150−160 +194%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 −186%	220−230 +186%
Counter-Strike 2	45 −189%	130−140 +189%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 −194%	150−160 +194%
Forza Horizon 4	123 −185%	350−400 +185%
Forza Horizon 5	65−70 −188%	190−200 +188%
Metro Exodus	65−70 −188%	190−200 +188%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 −191%	160−170 +191%
Valorant	100−110 −187%	290−300 +187%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 −186%	220−230 +186%
Counter-Strike 2	35 −186%	100−105 +186%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 −194%	150−160 +194%
Dota 2	85−90 −191%	250−260 +191%
Far Cry 5	33 −188%	95−100 +188%
Fortnite	120−130 −178%	350−400 +178%
Forza Horizon 4	101 −187%	290−300 +187%
Forza Horizon 5	65−70 −188%	190−200 +188%
Grand Theft Auto V	85−90 −191%	250−260 +191%
Metro Exodus	65−70 −188%	190−200 +188%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	150−160 −185%	450−500 +185%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 −191%	160−170 +191%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	80−85 −193%	240−250 +193%
Valorant	100−110 −187%	290−300 +187%
World of Tanks	250−260 −191%	750−800 +191%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 −186%	220−230 +186%
Counter-Strike 2	29 −193%	85−90 +193%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 −194%	150−160 +194%
Dota 2	85−90 −191%	250−260 +191%
Far Cry 5	75−80 −186%	220−230 +186%
Forza Horizon 4	88 −195%	260−270 +195%
Forza Horizon 5	65−70 −188%	190−200 +188%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	150−160 −185%	450−500 +185%
Valorant	100−110 −187%	290−300 +187%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	40−45 −186%	120−130 +186%
Grand Theft Auto V	40−45 −179%	120−130 +179%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −186%	500−550 +186%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −183%	65−70 +183%
World of Tanks	160−170 −171%	450−500 +171%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 −194%	150−160 +194%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −195%	65−70 +195%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −186%	60−65 +186%
Far Cry 5	70−75 −184%	210−220 +184%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −184%	190−200 +184%
Forza Horizon 5	40−45 −175%	110−120 +175%
Metro Exodus	55−60 −181%	160−170 +181%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −170%	100−105 +170%
Valorant	65−70 −194%	200−210 +194%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	20−22 −175%	55−60 +175%
Dota 2	40−45 −195%	130−140 +195%
Grand Theft Auto V	40−45 −195%	130−140 +195%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −189%	55−60 +189%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 −186%	220−230 +186%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −181%	45−50 +181%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 −195%	130−140 +195%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −188%	75−80 +188%
Counter-Strike 2	20−22 −175%	55−60 +175%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%
Dota 2	40−45 −195%	130−140 +195%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −188%	95−100 +188%
Fortnite	30−35 −190%	90−95 +190%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −182%	110−120 +182%
Forza Horizon 5	21−24 −186%	60−65 +186%
Valorant	30−35 −188%	95−100 +188%

This is how RX 6550M and RTX 4090 D compete in popular games:

RTX 4090 D is 196% faster in 1080p
RTX 4090 D is 192% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	24.21	71.78
Recency	4 January 2023	28 December 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	24 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	425 Watt

RX 6550M has 431.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4090 D, on the other hand, has a 196.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4090 D is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6550M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6550M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4090 D is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.