Data Center GPU Max 1100 vs Radeon RX 6550M
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 213 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 21.79 | no data |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024) | Generation 12.5 (2021−2023) |
| GPU code name | Navi 24 | Ponte Vecchio |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) | 10 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1024 | 7168 |
| Core clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2840 MHz | 1550 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 5,400 million | 100,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 181.8 | 694.4 |
| Floating-point processing power | 5.816 TFLOPS | 22.22 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | no data |
| TMUs | 64 | 448 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 448 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 56 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 12-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2e |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 48 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 8192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | 1,229 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.2 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | N/A |
Pros & cons summary
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 48 GB |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 300 Watt |
RX 6550M has a 66.7% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.
Data Center GPU Max 1100, on the other hand, has a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount.
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6550M and Data Center GPU Max 1100. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon RX 6550M is a notebook card while Data Center GPU Max 1100 is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
